Correcting Nonuniformities in MRI Intensities Using Entropy Minimization Based on an Elastic Model

Nonuniformity in the pixel intensity in homogeneous regions of an observed image is modeled as a multiplicative smooth bias field. The multiplicative bias field tends to increase the entropy of the original image. Thus, the entropy of the observed image is minimized to estimate the original image. The entropy minimization should be constrained such that the estimated image is close to the observed image and the estimated bias field is smooth. To enforce these constraints, the bias field is modeled as a thin–plate deforming elastically. Mathematically, the elastic deformation is described using the partial differential equation (PDE) with the body force evaluated at each pixel. In our formulation, the body force is evaluated such that the overall entropy of the image decreases. In addition, modeling the bias field as an elastic deformation ensures that the estimated image is close to the observed image and that the bias field is smooth. This provides a mathematical formulation which is simple and devoid of weighting parameters for various constraints of interest. The performance of our proposed algorithm is evaluated using both 2D and 3D simulated and real subject brain MR images.

[1]  Computer-Assisted Intervention,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI’99 , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A Modified Fuzzy C-Means Algorithm for MRI Bias Field Estimation and Adaptive Segmentation , 1999, MICCAI.

[3]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Bias Field in MR Brain Images: Investigating Different Modelings of the Imaging Process , 2001, MICCAI.

[4]  M S Cohen,et al.  Rapid and effective correction of RF inhomogeneity for high field magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  M. Bronskill,et al.  Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1986, Medical physics.

[8]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Six Algorithms for Correcting Intensity Nonuniformity Effects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[10]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[11]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[12]  Wiro J. Niessen,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2001 , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[13]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[14]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[15]  S. Arridge,et al.  Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1.5 T , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[18]  J. Mangin,et al.  Entropy minimization for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. MMBIA-2000 (Cat. No.PR00737).