States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program

This article illustrates the use of the directed dyad-year event history analysis to study policy diffusion, with an application to policy changes in the Children’s Health Insurance Program from 1998 to 2001. This analysis reveals strong evidence that states with successful policies are more likely to be emulated than are those with failing policies. Evidence of success is especially relevant for policy changes that lower program costs rather than those raising costs, and for changes made by legislatures rather than by administrative agencies. Moreover, this study reveals policy diffusion based on political, demographic, and budgetary similarities across states, rather than simply geographic proximity.

[1]  D. Knoke Political Networks: Contents , 1990 .

[2]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Conceptual issues in the study of innovation , 1976 .

[3]  D. Knoke Political Networks: Political Networks , 1990 .

[4]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Will Laws , 1991, The Journal of Politics.

[5]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[6]  David A. Peterson,et al.  Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion , 2004 .

[7]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Steven J. Balla,et al.  Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations , 2001 .

[9]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Measurement Quality Issues in Dyadic Models of Relationships , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[10]  Robert L. Crain,et al.  Fluoridation: The Diffusion of an Innovation among Cities , 1966 .

[11]  Alan Richards,et al.  Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[12]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[13]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[14]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[15]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Harvey S. Rosen,et al.  Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states , 1993 .

[17]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[18]  R. Burt,et al.  Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction , 1983 .

[19]  B. B. D. Mesquita,et al.  War and reason : domestic and international imperatives , 1992 .

[20]  William D. Berry,et al.  Reassessing the “Race to the Bottom” in State Welfare Policy , 2003 .

[21]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  D. Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective , 1992 .

[23]  Jack L. Walker The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[24]  Chad L Westerland,et al.  Duration Dependence, Functional Form, and Corrected Standard Errors: Improving EHA Models of State Policy Diffusion , 2004, State Politics & Policy Quarterly.

[25]  Gregory A. Caldeira The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[26]  P. Peterson,et al.  Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard , 1990 .

[27]  C. Volden The Politics of Competitive Federalism: A Race to the Bottom in Welfare Benefits? , 2002 .

[28]  Frederick J. Boehmke,et al.  Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion , 2004 .

[29]  John H. Miller,et al.  Decentralization and the Search for Policy Solutions , 2000 .

[30]  C. Mooney,et al.  Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform , 1995 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[32]  V. Huang,et al.  The Children's Health Insurance Program: expanding the framework to evaluate state goals and performance. , 2000, The Milbank quarterly.

[33]  Frances S. Berry Innovation in Public Management: The Adoption of Strategic Planning , 1994 .

[34]  A. Stam,et al.  Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation , 2003, American Political Science Review.