A comparison of AME and CR100 for scaling perceived exertion.

In psychophysical studies of the relation between perceived magnitude and physical stimulus, interest has focused on the preciseness of growth functions. Very little interest has been devoted to natural levels of an "absolute" character and to the validity of direct measurements. In this article, the Category (C)-Ratio (R) (CR) scaling methodology, developed by Borg (1973, 1977, 1982) is presented together with a new CR scale: the CR100 scale. In an experiment on perceived exertion, CR100 was compared with Absolute Magnitude Estimation (AME). Perceived exertion has the advantage of having easily measured physiological variables that can function as validity criteria. 32 persons (16 men and 16 women) participated as subjects on two different occasions, and the presentation order was counterbalanced. Results from CR100 and AME could be described equally well with psychophysical functions. The exponents obtained with CR100 were n = 1.60 for women and n = 1.69 for men, and the corresponding exponents for AME were n = 1.60 for women and n = 1.46 for men (with a "noise" constant included in the function). ANOVA showed that CR100 could make the predicted differentiation between sexes, whereas AME could not. This drawback with AME was also found when using the methods to predict working capacity.

[1]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[2]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  L E Marks,et al.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  A. Cavoukian Who knows , 1997 .

[5]  L E Marks,et al.  Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  L E Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching functions generated by magnitude estimation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  L E Marks,et al.  Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  H. Wahlund,et al.  Determination of the Physical Working Capacity. A Physiological and Clinical Study with special reference to Standardization of Cardio-Pulmonary Functional Tests. , 1948 .

[9]  M. Teghtsoonian,et al.  Range of acceptable stimulus intensities: An estimator of dynamic range for intensive perceptual continua , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Stanley J. Bolanowski,et al.  The Career of a Methodology. (Book Reviews: Ratio Scaling of Psychological Magnitude. In Honor of the Memory of S. S. Stevens.) , 1990 .

[11]  N. C. Sharp,et al.  Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1993 .

[12]  L. Marks,et al.  Twelve meanings of the measure constant in psychophysical power functions , 1983 .

[13]  S. Coren,et al.  In Sensation and perception , 1979 .

[14]  L M Ward,et al.  Constrained scaling: The effect of learned psychophysical scales on idiosyncratic response bias , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  B. Green,et al.  Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas Lindvall,et al.  A psychological detection method in environmental research , 1974 .

[17]  G. Borg Physical performance and perceived exertion , 1962 .

[18]  S. Parker,et al.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  S. Link,et al.  Bias in Quantifying Judgments , 1989 .

[20]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[21]  THE EFFECTS OF FATIGUE ON THE PERCEPTION OF MUSCULAR EFFORT1 , 1977 .

[22]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On Some Factors Affecting the Estimation of Loudness , 1960 .

[23]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Physical work and effort: Edited by Gunnar Borg Pergamon Press, Headington Hill Hall, Oxford. pp 442 £16.00 , 1978 .

[24]  S. S. Stevens Issues in psychophysical measurement. , 1971 .

[25]  G. Borg Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. , 2019, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[26]  G. Borg Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales , 1998 .

[27]  H. Montgomery,et al.  Direct estimation: effect of methodological factors on scale type. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[28]  G Borg,et al.  Comparison between the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Category Ratio Scale (CR-10) for the evaluation of leg exertion. , 1992, International journal of sports medicine.

[29]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[30]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .