Value Creation by Toolkits for User Innovation and Design: The Case of the Watch Market

This study analyzes the value created by so-called ‘‘toolkits for user innovation and design,’’ a new method of integrating customers into new product development and design. Toolkits allow customers to create their own product, which in turn is produced by the manufacturer. In the present study, questions asked were (1) if customers actually make use of the solution space offered by toolkits, and, if so, (2) how much value the self-design actually creates. In this study, a relatively simple, design-focused toolkit was used for a set of four experiments with a total of 717 participants, 267 of whom actually created their own watches. The heterogeneity of the resulting design solutions was calculated using the entropy concept, and willingness to pay (WTP) was measured by the contingent valuation method and Vickrey auctions. Entropy coefficients showed that self-designed watches vary quite widely. On the other hand, significant patterns still are visible despite this high level of entropy, meaning that customer preferences are highly heterogeneous and diverse in style but not completely random. It also was found that consumers are willing to pay a considerable price premium. Their WTP for a self-designed watch exceeds the WTP for standard watches by far, even for the best-selling standard watches of the same technical quality. On average, a 100% value increment was found for watches designed by users with the help of the toolkit. Taken together, these findings suggest that the toolkit’s ability to allow customers to customize products to suit their individual preferences creates value for them in a business-to-consumer (B2C) setting even when only a simple toolkit is employed. Alternative explanations, implications, and necessary future research are discussed.

[1]  Reavis Cox,et al.  Towards a Theory of Marketing , 1948 .

[2]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  M. Polanyi.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[4]  W. K. Vickery,et al.  Counter-Speculation Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[5]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[6]  Michael P. Kelly.  Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy , 1963 .

[7]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  10 – Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change1 , 1968 .

[8]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[9]  J. Herniter.  An entropy model of brand purchase behavior , 1973 .

[10]  J. Bezdek.  Numerical taxonomy with fuzzy sets , 1974 .

[11]  S. Welch.  SAMPLING BY REFERRAL IN A DISPERSED POPULATION , 1975 .

[12]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  The Nature and Scope of Marketing , 1976 .

[13]  J. Arndt.  How Broad Should the Marketing Concept Be , 1978 .

[14]  J. Jacoby.  Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review , 1978 .

[15]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Product Failure Rates — Facts and Fallacies , 1979 .

[16]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The Dimensions of Industrial New Product Success and Failure , 1979 .

[17]  Stephen W. Brown,et al.  Conceptual and theoretical developments in marketing , 1979 .

[18]  D. Horsky,et al.  Interfaces between Marketing and Economics: An Overview , 1980 .

[19]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[20]  V. Smith,et al.  Papers in Experimental Economics: Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions , 1982 .

[21]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance , 1982 .

[22]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing , 1983 .

[23]  William L. Shanklin,et al.  Marketing High Technology , 1984 .

[24]  J. Arndt,et al.  On Making Marketing Science More Scientific: Role of Orientations, Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving , 1985 .

[25]  D. Wegner,et al.  Cognitive interdependence in close relationships , 1985 .

[26]  Siew Meng Leong,et al.  Metatheory and Metamethodology in Marketing: A Lakatosian Reconstruction , 1985 .

[27]  K. Backhaus,et al.  Behavioral industrial marketing research in Germany and the United States--A comparison , 1985 .

[28]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[29]  D. Wegner.  Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[30]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[31]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[32]  D. G. Jones,et al.  Early Development of the Philosophy of Marketing Thought , 1990 .

[33]  S. Vachani,et al.  Distinguishing Between Related and Unrelated International Geographic Diversification: A Comprehensive Measure of Global Diversification , 1991 .

[34]  S. Fournier,et al.  Meaning-Based Framework For the Study of Consumer-Object Relations , 1991 .

[35]  H. Dittmar.  The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be , 1992 .

[36]  J. P. Peter.  Realism or Relativism for Marketing Theory and Research: A Comment on Hunt's “Scientific Realism” , 1992 .

[37]  Kazuyoshi Ishii,et al.  A process design approach based on the fusion model , 1992 .

[38]  Raymond A. K. Cox,et al.  Patterns of Research Output in the Accounting Literature: A Study of the Bibliometric Distributions , 1992 .

[39]  P. Strong,et al.  The case for qualitative research , 1992 .

[40]  M. Holbrook,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research , 1993 .

[41]  Dale J. Menkhaus,et al.  Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef , 1993 .

[42]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[43]  Thomas Martinetz,et al.  Topology representing networks , 1994, Neural Networks.

[44]  John Fraedrich,et al.  Assessing the application of cognitive moral development theory to business ethics , 1994 .

[45]  R. Teas,et al.  Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: An Assessment of a Reassessment , 1994 .

[46]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  Enhancing concept test validity by using expert consumers , 1995 .

[47]  D. Wegner.  A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[48]  E. Soofi,et al.  Information-theoretic estimation of individual consideration set , 1995 .

[49]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Agents that reduce work and information overload , 1994, CACM.

[50]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[51]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[52]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Software Tools for New Product Development , 1997 .

[53]  Stephen E. G. Lea,et al.  Pride in economic psychology , 1997 .

[54]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[55]  S. Ogawa.  Does sticky information affect the locus of innovation? Evidence from the Japanese convenience-store industry , 1998 .

[56]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Modes of experimentation: an innovation process--and competitive--variable , 1998 .

[57]  Ian Barclay,et al.  New Product Development From Past Research to Future Applications , 1998 .

[58]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[59]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Gaming against Managers in Incentive Systems: Experimental Results with Chinese Students and Chinese Managers , 1999 .

[60]  C. Whan Park,et al.  Choosing What I Want versus Rejecting What I Do Not Want: An Application of Decision Framing to Product Option Choice Decisions , 2000 .

[61]  T. V. Kumaresh,et al.  The false promise of mass customization , 2001 .

[62]  J. Wind,et al.  Customerization: The next revolution in mass customization , 2001 .

[63]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Inferring Market Structure from Customer Response to Competing and Complementary Products , 2001 .

[64]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[65]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[66]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies , 2001 .

[67]  Erik L. Olson,et al.  Implementing the lead user method in a high technology firm: A longitudinal study of intentions versus actions , 2001 .

[68]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 247–257 PERSPECTIVE: User toolkits for innovation , 2022 .

[69]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  The Limits of Mass Customization , 2001 .

[70]  H. Strasser,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach to Perceptions-Based Market Segmentation: Foundations , 2001 .

[71]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The PDMA toolbook for new product development , 2002 .

[72]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[73]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[74]  Gerard A. Athaide,et al.  Managing seller-buyer new product development relationships for customized products: a contingency model based on transaction cost analysis and empirical test , 2002 .

[75]  K. A. Renninger,et al.  Individual interest as context in expository text and mathematical word problems , 2002 .

[76]  J. Hauser,et al.  The virtual customer , 2002 .

[77]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[78]  The Publication Patterns of the Elite Economics Departments: 1995-2000 , 2002 .

[79]  Irwin P. Levin,et al.  A Tale of Two Pizzas: Building Up from a Basic Product Versus Scaling Down from a Fully-Loaded Product , 2002 .

[80]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: Moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors , 2002 .

[81]  V. Theoharakis,et al.  Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective , 2002 .

[82]  E. Hippel,et al.  Customers As Innovators: A New Way to Create Value , 2002 .

[83]  Lars Bo Jeppesen,et al.  THE IMPLICATIONS OF "USER TOOLKITS FOR INNOVATION" , 2002 .

[84]  B. Skiera,et al.  Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase , 2002 .

[85]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[86]  Suzanne Loker,et al.  Mass Customization: On-line Consumer Involvement in Product Design , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[87]  Halimahtun M. Khalid,et al.  Web-Based Do-It-Yourself Product Design , 2003 .

[88]  Frank Thomas Piller,et al.  Key research issues in user interaction with user toolkits in a mass customisation system , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[89]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding commercially attractive user innovations: An exploration and test of "lead user" theory , 2003 .

[90]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  The Customer Centric Enterprise: Advances in Mass Customization and Personalization , 2003 .

[91]  Mitchell M. Tseng,et al.  The Customer Centric Enterprise , 2003 .

[92]  R. Pieters,et al.  The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Subareas over Time , 2003 .

[93]  Martin Schreier,et al.  Toolkits for User Innovation and Design , 2004 .

[94]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[95]  J. Sheth,et al.  Web-based marketing: The coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy , 2004 .

[96]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Using Students as Subjects—A Comparative Study of Students and Professionals in Lead-Time Impact Assessment , 2000, Empirical Software Engineering.

[97]  Linda Argote,et al.  Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[98]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[99]  S. Berg.  Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .