Linking Comprehensive Performance Assessment to the Balanced Scorecard: Evidence from Hertfordshire County Council

Over the course of the last twenty years there has been a growing academic interest in performance management, particularly in respect of the evolution of new techniques and their resulting impact. One important theoretical development has been the emergence of multidimensional performance measurement models that are potentially applicable within the public sector. Empirically, academic researchers are increasingly supporting the use of such models as a way of improving public sector management and the effectiveness of service provision (Mayston, 1985; Pollitt, 1986; Bates and Brignall, 1993; and Massey, 1999). This paper seeks to add to the literature by using both theoretical and empirical evidence to argue that CPA, the external inspection tool used by the Audit Commission to evaluate local authority performance management, is a version of the Balanced Scorecard which, when adapted for internal use, may have beneficial effects. After demonstrating the parallels between the CPA framework and Kaplan and Norton's public sector Balanced Scorecard (BSC), we use a case study of the BSC based performance management system in Hertfordshire County Council to demonstrate the empirical linkages between a local scorecard and CPA. We conclude that CPA is based upon the BSC and has the potential to serve as a springboard for the evolution of local authority performance management systems.

[1]  I. Lapsley,et al.  Making Management Auditable: The Implementation of Best Value in Local Government , 2008 .

[2]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  An Inquiry into Balanced Scorecards within Best Value Implementation in UK Local Government , 2003 .

[3]  Sven Modell Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note , 2004 .

[4]  Åge Johnsen,et al.  Balanced scorecard: theoretical perspectives and public management implications , 2001 .

[5]  C. Talbot Public Performance - towards a new model? , 1999 .

[6]  John Martin,et al.  Strategic performance management: A balanced approach to performance management issues in local government , 2000 .

[7]  P. Hepworth,et al.  Weighing it up ‐ a literature review for the balanced scorecard , 1998 .

[8]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II , 2001 .

[10]  Julie A. Chesley,et al.  Transforming an Organization: Using Models to Foster a Strategic Conversation , 1999 .

[11]  C. Hood The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[12]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy , 1996 .

[13]  J. Dalrymple,et al.  Performance Measurement In Local Government In Victoria , 2022 .

[14]  H. T. Bogt Politicians and output-oriented performance evaluation in municipalities , 2001 .

[15]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[16]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[17]  Edward G. Schilling,et al.  Juran's Quality Handbook , 1998 .

[18]  Mary Bowerman,et al.  An emergent audit agenda: comparative lessons drawn from Best Value development in Local Government in Scotland compared with England , 1999 .

[19]  A. Goddard,et al.  Performance, Strategy and Accounting in Local Government and Higher Education in the UK , 2007 .

[20]  NON-PROFIT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR , 2008 .

[21]  R. Johnston,et al.  Performance Measurement in Service Businesses , 1992 .

[22]  Lars-Goan Aidemark,et al.  The Meaning of Balanced Scorecards in the Health Care Organisation , 2001 .

[23]  R. Kaplan,et al.  PUTTING THE BALANCED SCORECARD TO WORK , 1993 .

[24]  T. Moe Perspectives on public choice: The positive theory of public bureaucracy , 1996 .

[25]  Åge Johnsen,et al.  Implementation Mode and Local Government Performance Measurement: A Norwegian Experience , 1999 .

[26]  Mik Wisniewski,et al.  Developing balanced scorecards in local authorities: a comparison of experience , 2004 .

[27]  C. Pollitt BEYOND THE MANAGERIAL MODEL: THE CASE FOR BROADENING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC SERVICES , 1986 .

[28]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[29]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[30]  Carol Propper,et al.  The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector , 2003 .

[31]  T. J. Brignall,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the 'New Public Sector' , 2000 .

[32]  R. McAdam,et al.  Sustaining quality in the UK public sector , 2002 .

[33]  Ad Kleingeld,et al.  Multilevel design of performance measurement systems: enhancing strategic dialogue throughout the organization☆ , 1999 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[35]  Åge Johnsen,et al.  What Does 25 Years of Experience Tell Us About the State of Performance Measurement in Public Policy and Management? , 2005 .

[36]  Y. L. Chan,et al.  Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecards , 2004 .

[37]  Hanne Nørreklit The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[38]  I. Sanderson,et al.  Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government , 2001 .

[39]  Ken Bates,et al.  RATIONALITY, POLITICS AND HEALTHCARE COSTING , 1993 .

[40]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Balanced Scorecard , 2019, Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition.

[41]  D. Forgione,et al.  Health care financial and quality measures: international call for a "balanced scorecard" approach. , 1997, Journal of health care finance.

[42]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[43]  A. Kouzmin,et al.  Managerialism : something old, something borrowed, little new economic prescription versus effective organizational change in public agencies , 1998 .