Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions

Setting aside pluripotent cells that give rise to the future body is a central cell fate decision in mammalian development. It requires that some blastomeres divide asymmetrically to direct cells to the inside of the embryo. Despite its importance, it is unknown whether the decision to divide symmetrically versus asymmetrically shows any spatial or temporal pattern, whether it is lineage-dependent or occurs at random, or whether it influences the orientation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis. To address these questions, we developed time-lapse microscopy to enable a complete 3D analysis of the origins, fates and divisions of all cells from the 2- to 32-cell blastocyst stage. This showed how in the majority of embryos, individual blastomeres give rise to distinct blastocyst regions. Tracking the division orientation of all cells revealed a spatial and temporal relationship between symmetric and asymmetric divisions and how this contributes to the generation of inside and outside cells and thus embryo patterning. We found that the blastocyst cavity, defining the abembryonic pole, forms where symmetric divisions predominate. Tracking cell ancestry indicated that the pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions of a blastomere can be influenced by its origin in relation to the animal-vegetal axis of the zygote. Thus, it appears that the orientation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis is anticipated by earlier cell division patterns. Together, our results suggest that two steps influence the allocation of cells to the blastocyst. The first step, involving orientation of 2- to 4-cell divisions along the animal-vegetal axis, can affect the second step, the establishment of inside and outside cell populations by asymmetric 8- to 32-cell divisions.

[1]  T P Fleming,et al.  A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[2]  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Role for sperm in spatial patterning of the early mouse embryo , 2001, Nature.

[3]  Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis,et al.  Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice , 2004, BMC biotechnology.

[4]  J. Mulnard,et al.  Cell division and cell allocation in early mouse development. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[5]  M. Zernicka-Goetz The first cell-fate decisions in the mouse embryo: destiny is a matter of both chance and choice. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[6]  P. Barlow,et al.  DNA synthesis in the preimplantation mouse embryo. , 1972, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[7]  S. Komorowski,et al.  Both blastomeres of the mouse 2‐cell embryo contribute to the embryonic portion of the blastocyst , 2004, Molecular reproduction and development.

[8]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  First cleavage plane of the mouse egg is not predetermined but defined by the topology of the two apposing pronuclei , 2004, Nature.

[9]  M. Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  The first cleavage of the mouse zygote predicts the blastocyst axis , 2005, Nature.

[10]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo , 2007, Development.

[11]  Yoko Kurotaki,et al.  Analysis of cell lineage in two- and four-cell mouse embryos , 2003, Development.

[12]  M. Johnson,et al.  When and how does cell division order influence cell allocation to the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst? , 1987, Development.

[13]  Jie Na,et al.  First Cleavage of the Mouse Embryo Responds to Change in Egg Shape at Fertilization , 2004, Current Biology.

[14]  R. Gardner The axis of polarity of the mouse blastocyst is specified before blastulation and independently of the zona pellucida. , 2007, Human reproduction.

[15]  H. Schnabel,et al.  Assessing normal embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans using a 4D microscope: variability of development and regional specification. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[16]  R. Gardner,et al.  Experimental analysis of second cleavage in the mouse. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[17]  Nancy Papalopulu,et al.  Downregulation of Par3 and aPKC function directs cells towards the ICM in the preimplantation mouse embryo , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  Y. Marikawa,et al.  Deviation of the Blastocyst Axis from the First Cleavage Plane Does Not Affect the Quality of Mouse Postimplantation Development1 , 2003, Biology of reproduction.

[19]  W. Dean,et al.  Epigenetic arbitration of cell fate decisions: tipping the bias. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[20]  Yoko Kurotaki,et al.  Blastocyst Axis Is Specified Independently of Early Cell Lineage But Aligns with the ZP Shape , 2007, Science.

[21]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Polarity of the mouse embryo is established at blastocyst and is not prepatterned. , 2005, Genes & development.

[22]  B. Maro,et al.  Mitotic Spindles and Cleavage Planes Are Oriented Randomly in the Two-Cell Mouse Embryo , 2005, Current Biology.

[23]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Blastomeres arising from the first cleavage division have distinguishable fates in normal mouse development. , 2001, Development.

[24]  R. Gardner,et al.  Trophectoderm growth and bilateral symmetry of the blastocyst in the mouse. , 2002, Human reproduction.

[25]  R. Gardner,et al.  The early blastocyst is bilaterally symmetrical and its axis of symmetry is aligned with the animal-vegetal axis of the zygote in the mouse. , 1997, Development.

[26]  M. Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Aitana Perea-Gomez,et al.  Four-cell stage mouse blastomeres have different developmental properties , 2005, Development.

[28]  Z. A. Deussen,et al.  Features of cell lineage in preimplantation mouse development. , 1978, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[29]  M. Surani,et al.  Spatial distribution of blastomeres is dependent on cell division order and interactions in mouse morulae. , 1984, Developmental biology.

[30]  Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Spatial arrangement of individual 4-cell stage blastomeres and the order in which they are generated correlate with blastocyst pattern in the mouse embryo , 2005, Mechanisms of Development.

[31]  C. Ziomek,et al.  The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within the mouse morula , 1981, Cell.

[32]  R. Gardner,et al.  Specification of embryonic axes begins before cleavage in normal mouse development. , 2001, Development.