BBB leakage, astrogliosis, and tissue loss correlate with silicon microelectrode array recording performance.

The clinical usefulness of brain machine interfaces that employ penetrating silicon microelectrode arrays is limited by inconsistent performance at chronic time points. While it is widely believed that elements of the foreign body response (FBR) contribute to inconsistent single unit recording performance, the relationships between the FBR and recording performance have not been well established. To address this shortfall, we implanted 4X4 Utah Electrode Arrays into the cortex of 28 young adult rats, acquired electrophysiological recordings weekly for up to 12 weeks, used quantitative immunohistochemical methods to examine the intensity and spatial distribution of neural and FBR biomarkers, and examined whether relationships existed between biomarker distribution and recording performance. We observed that the FBR was characterized by persistent inflammation and consisted of typical biomarkers, including presumptive activated macrophages and activated microglia, astrogliosis, and plasma proteins indicative of blood-brain-barrier disruption, as well as general decreases in neuronal process distribution. However, unlike what has been described for recording electrodes that create only a single penetrating injury, substantial brain tissue loss generally in the shape of a pyramidal lesion cavity was observed at the implantation site. Such lesions were also observed in stab wounded animals indicating that the damage was caused by vascular disruption at the time of implantation. Using statistical approaches, we found that blood-brain barrier leakiness and astrogliosis were both associated with reduced recording performance, and that tissue loss was negatively correlated with recording performance. Taken together, our data suggest that a reduction of vascular damage at the time of implantation either by design changes or use of hemostatic coatings coupled to a reduction of chronic inflammatory sequela will likely improve the recording performance of high density intracortical silicon microelectrode arrays over long indwelling periods and lead to enhanced clinical use of this promising technology.

[1]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[2]  Victor Pikov,et al.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  David C. Martin,et al.  Neuronal cell loss accompanies the brain tissue response to chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[4]  E. Manuelidis,et al.  Histopathological changes produced by implanted electrodes in cat brains; comparison with histopathological changes in human and experimental puncture wounds. , 1957, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Craig T. Nordhausen,et al.  Single unit recording capabilities of a 100 microelectrode array , 1996, Brain Research.

[6]  P. Tresco,et al.  Acute microelectrode array implantation into human neocortex: preliminary technique and histological considerations. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[7]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[8]  X Liu,et al.  Stability of the interface between neural tissue and chronically implanted intracortical microelectrodes. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  David Kleinfeld,et al.  The smallest stroke: occlusion of one penetrating vessel leads to infarction and a cognitive deficit , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Comprehensive characterization and failure modes of tungsten microwire arrays in chronic neural implants , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P. Tresco,et al.  A strategy to passively reduce neuroinflammation surrounding devices implanted chronically in brain tissue by manipulating device surface permeability. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[13]  Anthony N. Burkitt,et al.  Seizure severity and duration in the cortical stimulation model of experimental epilepsy in rats: A longitudinal study , 2010, Epilepsy Research.

[14]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[15]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Evaluation of the stability of intracortical microelectrode arrays , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[16]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  Reducing surface area while maintaining implant penetrating profile lowers the brain foreign body response to chronically implanted planar silicon microelectrode arrays. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[17]  Kelsey A. Potter,et al.  Stab injury and device implantation within the brain results in inversely multiphasic neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative responses , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[18]  J Miller,et al.  Minocycline increases quality and longevity of chronic neural recordings , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[20]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices , 2003, Brain Research.

[21]  Karen L. Smith,et al.  Effects of insertion conditions on tissue strain and vascular damage during neuroprosthetic device insertion , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[22]  D. McCreery,et al.  Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation , 1986, Experimental Neurology.

[23]  Jens Schouenborg,et al.  Multiple Implants Do Not Aggravate the Tissue Reaction in Rat Brain , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Florian Solzbacher,et al.  A comparison of the tissue response to chronically implanted Parylene-C-coated and uncoated planar silicon microelectrode arrays in rat cortex. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  R. Normann,et al.  Chronic recording capability of the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array in cat sensory cortex , 1998, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  E. Maynard,et al.  A technique to prevent dural adhesions to chronically implanted microelectrode arrays , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  A high-performance brain–computer interface , 2006, Nature.

[28]  R L Schultz,et al.  The ultrastructure of the sheath around chronically implanted electrodes in brain , 1976, Journal of neurocytology.

[29]  Shaomin Zhang,et al.  Reliability of directional information in unsorted spikes and local field potentials recorded in human motor cortex , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[30]  M. D. Del Bigio,et al.  Intracortical hemorrhage injury in rats : relationship between blood fractions and brain cell death. , 2000, Stroke.

[31]  Garrett B Stanley,et al.  The impact of chronic blood-brain barrier breach on intracortical electrode function. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[32]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Seven Years of Recording from Monkey Cortex with a Chronically Implanted Multiple Microelectrode , 2010, Front. Neuroeng..

[33]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  The brain tissue response to implanted silicon microelectrode arrays is increased when the device is tethered to the skull. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  D. Edell,et al.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Nick F. Ramsey,et al.  Physiological Challenges for Intracortical Electrodes , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[37]  Suzanne S. Stensaas,et al.  Histopathological evaluation of materials implanted in the cerebral cortex , 1978, Acta Neuropathologica.

[38]  A. Levey,et al.  Implanted neural electrodes cause chronic, local inflammation that is correlated with local neurodegeneration , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  M. Ward,et al.  Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings , 2009, Brain Research.

[40]  Ravi V. Bellamkonda,et al.  Extraction Force and Cortical Tissue Reaction of Silicon Microelectrode Arrays Implanted in the Rat Brain , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  Patrick A Tresco,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the tissue response to chronically implanted microwire electrodes in rat cortex. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[42]  K. Horch,et al.  Biocompatibility of silicon-based electrode arrays implanted in feline cortical tissue. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[43]  Daryl R Kipke,et al.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[44]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Ultra-miniature headstage with 6-channel drive and vacuum-assisted micro-wire implantation for chronic recording from the neocortex , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  P H Crandall,et al.  Brain tissue reaction to some chronically implanted metals. , 1970, Journal of neurosurgery.

[46]  Y. Imai,et al.  Involvement of Iba1 in membrane ruffling and phagocytosis of macrophages/microglia. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[47]  D R Kipke,et al.  Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[48]  Edgard Morya,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue Preservation and Recording Quality from Chronic Multielectrode Implants , 2011, PloS one.

[49]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  Abiotic-biotic characterization of Pt/Ir microelectrode arrays in chronic implants , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[50]  D. Kipke,et al.  Long-term neural recording characteristics of wire microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex. , 1999, Brain research. Brain research protocols.