SUPIR: Surface Uncertainty-Penalized, Non-rigid Image Registration for Pelvic CT Imaging

Intensity-driven image registration does not always produce satisfactory pointwise correspondences in regions of low soft-tissue contrast characteristic of pelvic computed tomography (CT) imaging. Additional information such as manually segmented organ surfaces can be combined with intensity information to improve registration. However, this approach is sensitive to non-negligible surface segmentation errors (delineation errors) due to the relative poor soft-tissue contrast supported by CT. This paper presents an image registration algorithm that mitigates the impact of delineation errors by weighting each surface element by its segmentation uncertainty. This weighting ensures that portions of the surface that are specified accurately are used to guide the registration while portions of the surface that are uncertain are ignored. In our proof-of-principle validation, Monte Carlo simulations based on simple 3D phantoms demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed method. These experiments show that registration performance can be improved using surface uncertainty in certain circumstances but not in others. Results are presented for situations when intensity only registration performs best, when intensity plus equally weighted surface registration performs best, and when intensity plus uncertainty weighted surface registration performs best. The algorithm has been applied to register CBCT and FBCT prostate images where the uncertainty of the prostate surface segmentation was estimated using contours drawn by five experts.

[1]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Surface-Constrained Volumetric Brain Registration Using Harmonic Mappings , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  M van Herk,et al.  A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parameterization-Invariant Shape Statistics and Probabilistic Classification of Anatomical Surfaces , 2011, IPMI.

[5]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Using Points and Surfaces to Improve Voxel-Based Non-rigid Registration , 2002, MICCAI.

[8]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Constrained non-rigid registration for use in image-guided adaptive radiotherapy , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Medical Image Analysis: Progress over Two Decades and the Challenges Ahead , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Jeffrey Williamson,et al.  Development of a population-based model of surface segmentation uncertainties for uncertainty-weighted deformable image registrations. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Combined Volumetric and Surface Registration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Karl Rohr,et al.  Physics-based elastic registration using non-radial basis functions and including landmark localization uncertainties , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[15]  Jürgen Weese,et al.  Landmark-based elastic registration using approximating thin-plate splines , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Parameterization-Invariant Shape Comparisons of Anatomical Surfaces , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.