Process reveals structure: How a network is traversed mediates expectations about its architecture

Network science has emerged as a powerful tool through which we can study the higher-order architectural properties of the world around us. How human learners exploit this information remains an essential question. Here, we focus on the temporal constraints that govern such a process. Participants viewed a continuous sequence of images generated by three distinct walks on a modular network. Walks varied along two critical dimensions: their predictability and the density with which they sampled from communities of images. Learners exposed to walks that richly sampled from each community exhibited a sharp increase in processing time upon entry into a new community. This effect was eliminated in a highly regular walk that sampled exhaustively from images in short, successive cycles (i.e., that increasingly minimized uncertainty about the nature of upcoming stimuli). These results demonstrate that temporal organization plays an essential role in learners’ sensitivity to the network architecture underlying sensory input.

[1]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[2]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Denis Mareschal,et al.  TRACX: a recognition-based connectionist framework for sequence segmentation and chunk extraction. , 2011, Psychological review.

[6]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[8]  V. D. P. Servedio,et al.  Optimal Learning Paths in Information Networks , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  R. Aslin,et al.  Learning bundles of stimuli renders stimulus order as a cue, not a confound , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[11]  Michael S. Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of clustering coefficient on word-learning: how groups of similar sounding words facilitate acquisition , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[12]  Elisabeth A. Karuza,et al.  On-line Measures of Prediction in a Self-Paced Statistical Learning Task , 2014, CogSci.

[13]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[14]  D Broadbent,et al.  Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Shekeila D Palmer,et al.  Speech segmentation by statistical learning is supported by domain-general processes within working memory , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models , 1986 .

[20]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Local Patterns to Global Architectures: Influences of Network Topology on Human Learning Relating Two Approaches Complex Networks Are Pervasive Network Topology Influences Learning and Memory Local Statistics Underpin Network Architecture , 2022 .

[22]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[23]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Feature Biases in Early Word Learning: Network Distinctiveness Predicts Age of Acquisition. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[24]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[25]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Neural representations of events arise from temporal community structure , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[27]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Charles Kemp,et al.  Bayesian models of cognition , 2008 .

[30]  Joshua T. Abbott,et al.  Random walks on semantic networks can resemble optimal foraging. , 2015, Psychological review.

[31]  Alex B. Fine,et al.  Evidence for Implicit Learning in Syntactic Comprehension , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Optimal foraging in semantic memory. , 2012, Psychological review.

[33]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[34]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Approaching human language with complex networks. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[35]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning: Efficient Detection of Visual Regularities Without Awareness , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[37]  Todd M. Gureckis,et al.  CUNY Academic , 2016 .

[38]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[40]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Cognitive Network Neuroscience , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.