Component processes in the perception of bilaterally symmetric dot textures

If a random-dot texture is reflected about a given axis, the resulting bilateral symmetry is immediately detected. In order to account for this ability, it has been suggested that the visual system detects reflection in these dot textures because of the existence of a symmetric neural organization, centered about the fovea, which performs a point-by-point analysis. As yet, there is no evidence of such an organization in the human visual system. An alternative description of a bilaterally symmetric texture, that of a two-dimensional distribution of uniformly oriented point-pair elements, of nonuniform size and with collinear midpoints, is more consistent with known mammalian visual-system neurophysiology. Experiments were conducted in order to determine whether the human visual system is sensitive to the orientational uniformity of otherwise nonuniform point-pair elements and to their midpoint collinearity. The results indicate that there are three processes involved in the perception of bilaterally symmetric dot textures: the detection of orientational uniformity of the different sized point-pair elements; the fusion of salient element point-pairs into a salient feature; the detection of the symmetry of the resulting feature. This component-process hypothesis eliminates the necessity to postulate the existence of a symmetrical neural organization centered about the fovea.

[1]  M. Corballis,et al.  Bilateral symmetry and behavior. , 1970, Psychological review.

[2]  B Jenkins,et al.  Spatial limits to the detection of transpositional symmetry in dynamic dot textures. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  M. Corballis,et al.  The role of left-right orientation in interhemispheric matching of visual information , 1971 .

[4]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[5]  M. Corballis,et al.  Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Ross,et al.  Size constancy fails below half a degree , 1980, Nature.

[7]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[8]  Temporal limits to the detection of correlation in transpositionally symmetric dynamic dot textures , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R Sekuler,et al.  Perception of stimulus direction: hemispheric homology and laterality. , 1973, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  B. Jenkins,et al.  Redundancy in the perception of bilateral symmetry in dot textures , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  L. Glass,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Humans: Correlations Which Cannot be Perceived , 1976, Perception.

[12]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .

[13]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The Perception and Identification of Mirror-Reversed Patterns , 1976, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  Ernst Mach,et al.  The analysis of sensations and the relation of the physical to the psychical , 1914, The Mathematical Gazette.

[16]  F. Attneave,et al.  What Variables Produce Similarity Grouping , 1970 .

[17]  L. Glass Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[18]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Stimulus and response factors in mirror-image discrimination , 1977 .