Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.

The effect of amplitude-modulated (AM) noise on speech recognition in listeners with normal and impaired hearing was investigated in two experiments. In the first experiment nonsense syllables were presented in high-pass steady-state or AM noise to determine whether the release from masking in AM noise relative to steady-state noise was significantly different between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects when the two groups listened under equivalent masker conditions. The normal-hearing subjects were tested in the experimental noise under two conditions: (a) in a spectrally shaped broadband noise that produced pure tone thresholds equivalent to those of the hearing-impaired subjects, and (b) without the spectrally shaped broadband noise. The release from masking in AM noise was significantly greater for the normal-hearing group than for either the hearing-impaired or masked normal-hearing groups. In the second experiment, normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects identified nonsense syllables in isolation and target words in sentences in steady-state or AM noise adjusted to approximate the spectral shape and gain of a hearing aid prescription. The release from masking was significantly less for the subjects with impaired hearing. These data suggest that hearing-impaired listeners obtain less release from masking in AM noise than do normal-hearing listeners even when both the speech and noise are presented at levels that are above threshold over much of the speech frequency range.

[1]  R Plomp,et al.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  L. Humes Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking , 1994 .

[8]  R. H. Wilson,et al.  Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J R Dubno,et al.  Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[12]  Herman Medwin,et al.  Instrumentation for in situ acoustical measurements of bubble spectra under breaking waves , 1989 .

[13]  J. Allen,et al.  Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB)--a procedure for the assessment of loudness. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J M Festen,et al.  Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[15]  T W Tillman,et al.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.