In Vivo Evaluation of Melanoma Thickness by Multispectral Imaging and An Artificial Neural Network. A Retrospective Study on 250 Cases of Cutaneous Melanoma

Aims and Background Noninvasive diagnostic methods such as dermoscopy, sonography, palpation or combined approaches have been developed in an attempt to preoperatively estimate melanoma thickness. However, the clinical presentation is often complex and the evaluation subjective. Multispectral image analysis of melanomas allows selection of features related to the content and distribution of absorbers, mainly melanin and hemoglobin, present within the lesion. Hence, it is reasonable to assume that the same features might be useful to predict melanoma thickness. Methods A multispectral image system was used to analyze in vivo 1939 pigmented skin lesions. The lesion selection was based on clinical and/or dermoscopic features that supported a suspicion for melanoma. All the lesions were then subjected to surgery for the histopathological diagnosis, and 250 were melanomas. From the multispectral images of the melanomas, we selected 12 features, seven of which were used to train and test an artificial neural network on 155 and 95 melanomas, respectively. Results Sensitivity (i.e., melanoma ≥0.75 mm thick correctly classified) and specificity (i.e., melanoma <0.75 mm thick correctly classified) evaluated from the receiving operating characteristic curves ranged from 76 to 90% and from 91 to 74%, respectively. Conclusions Our approach provides results similar to those obtained with other methods and has the advantage that it is not related to the expertise of the clinician. In addition, the physical interpretation of the selected features suggests a possible role of spectrophotometry as an objective method to study the natural history of the early phases of the disease.

[1]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Narrow excision (1-cm margin). A safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma. , 1991, Archives of surgery.

[2]  D. Massi Clinical diagnosis and therapy of cutaneous melanoma in situ , 1996, Cancer.

[3]  P. Hutchinson,et al.  Clinical correlates of Breslow thickness of malignant melanoma , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  D. Coit,et al.  Sentinel lymph node evaluation in melanoma. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[5]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Micro-Melanoma Detection. A Clinical Study on 22 Cases of Melanoma with a Diameter Equal to or Less than 3 MM , 2004, Tumori.

[6]  G. Argenziano,et al.  Clinical and dermatoscopic criteria for the preoperative evaluation of cutaneous melanoma thickness. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  N. Cascinelli,et al.  Clinical diagnosis and therapy of cutaneous melanoma in situ , 1996, Cancer.

[8]  H. Lorentzen,et al.  Dermatoscopic prediction of melanoma thickness using latent trait analysis and likelihood ratios. , 2001, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[9]  Renato Marchesini,et al.  Melanoma Detection , 2002, Dermatology.

[10]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[11]  D. Sanders,et al.  Does palpability of primary cutaneous melanoma predict dermal invasion? , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[12]  Renato Marchesini,et al.  Automated melanoma detection with a novel multispectral imaging system: results of a prospective study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C. Balch,et al.  Efficacy of 2 cm surgical margins for intermediate thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm): Results of a multi-institutional randomized surgical trial , 1995 .

[14]  P Altmeyer,et al.  Malignant melanoma in 20-MHz B scan sonography. , 1992, Dermatology.

[15]  B. Natelson,et al.  Detection of Immunologically Significant Factors for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Using Neural-Network Classifiers , 2001, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[16]  B. Bastian,et al.  Preoperative characterization of pigmented skin lesions by epiluminescence microscopy and high-frequency ultrasound. , 1995, Archives of dermatology.

[17]  A. Cochran,et al.  Management of Early-Stage Melanoma by Intraoperative Lymphatic Mapping and Selective Lymphadenectomy: An Alternative to Routine Elective Lymphadenectomy or “Watch and Wait” , 1992 .

[18]  S. Seidenari,et al.  Preoperative melanoma thickness determination by 20-MHz sonography and digital videomicroscopy in combination. , 2003, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  Paul S. Heckerling,et al.  Entering the Black Box of Neural Networks , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[20]  P. Carli,et al.  Preoperative assessment of melanoma thickness by ABCD score of dermatoscopy. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[22]  Renato Marchesini,et al.  Automated melanoma detection: multispectral imaging and neural network approach for classification. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  A. Kopf,et al.  Early detection of malignant melanoma: The role of physician examination and self‐examination of the skin , 1985, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  P. Carli,et al.  Dermoscopy and preoperative evaluation of melanoma thickness. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[25]  N Cascinelli,et al.  Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  V. De Giorgi,et al.  Non-invasive analysis of melanoma thickness by means of dermoscopy: a retrospective study , 2001, Melanoma research.