An historical empirical line method for the retrieval of surface reflectance factor from multi-temporal SPOT HRV, HRVIR and HRG multispectral satellite imagery

SPOT satellites have been imaging Earth's surface since SPOT 1 was launched in 1986. It is argued that absolute atmospheric correction is a prerequisite for quantitative remote sensing. Areas where land cover changes are occurring rapidly are also often areas most lacking in situ data which would allow full use of radiative transfer models for reflectance factor retrieval (RFR). Consequently, this study details the proposed historical empirical line method (HELM) for RFR from multi-temporal SPOT imagery. HELM is designed for use in landscape level studies in circumstances where no detailed overpass concurrent atmospheric or meteorological data are available, but where there is field access to the research site(s) and a goniometer or spectrometer is available. SPOT data are complicated by the ±27° off-nadir cross track viewing. Calibration to nadir only surface reflectance factor (ρs) is denoted as HELM-1, whilst calibration to ρs modelling imagery illumination and view geometries is termed HELM-2. Comparisons of field measured ρs with those derived from HELM corrected SPOT imagery, covering Helsinki, Finland, and Taita Hills, Kenya, indicated HELM-1 RFR absolute accuracy was ±0.02ρs in the visible and near infrared (VIS/NIR) bands and ±0.03ρs in the shortwave infrared (SWIR), whilst HELM-2 performance was ±0.03ρs in the VIS/NIR and ±0.04ρs in the SWIR. This represented band specific relative errors of 10–15%. HELM-1 and HELM-2 RFR were significantly better than at-satellite reflectance (ρSAT), indicating HELM was effective in reducing atmospheric effects. However, neither HELM approach reduced variability in mean ρs between multi-temporal images, compared to ρSAT. HELM-1 calibration error is dependent on surface characteristics and scene illumination and view geometry. Based on multiangular ρs measurements of vegetation-free ground targets, calibration error was negligible in the forward scattering direction, even at maximum off-nadir view. However, error exceeds 0.02ρs where off-nadir viewing was ≥20° in the backscattering direction within ±55° azimuth of the principal plane. Overall, HELM-1 results were commensurate with an identified VIS/NIR 0.02ρs accuracy benchmark. HELM thus increases applicability of SPOT data to quantitative remote sensing studies.

[1]  Teemu Hakala,et al.  Polarised Multiangular Reflectance Measurements Using the Finnish Geodetic Institute Field Goniospectrometer , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  P. Mather,et al.  Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data , 2001 .

[3]  Klaus I. Itten,et al.  A field goniometer system (FIGOS) for acquisition of hyperspectral BRDF data , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance : success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE , 1992 .

[5]  R. Denham,et al.  An operational radiometric calibration procedure for the Landsat sensors based on pseudo-invariant target sites , 2007 .

[6]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Obtaining Surface Reflectance Factors from Atmospheric and View Angle Corrected SPOT-1 HRV Data , 1990 .

[7]  P. Chavez.  Image-Based Atmospheric Corrections - Revisited and Improved , 1996 .

[8]  Abderrazak Bannari,et al.  Potential of Getis statistics to characterize the radiometric uniformity and stability of test sites used for the calibration of Earth observation sensors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  J. Heiskanen.  Tree cover and height estimation in the Fennoscandian tundra-taiga transition zone using multiangular MISR data , 2006 .

[10]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery. I. Methods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[12]  P. Chavez.  Radiometric calibration of Landsat Thematic Mapper multispectral images , 1989 .

[13]  E. Milton,et al.  The use of the empirical line method to calibrate remotely sensed data to reflectance , 1999 .

[14]  Ross Bryant,et al.  Refined empirical line approach for retrieving surface reflectance from EO-1 ALI images , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  J. Hill,et al.  Recent Advances in Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Processing for Land Degradation Assessment , 2009 .

[16]  K. Thome.  Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat 7 ETM+ using the reflectance-based method , 2001 .

[17]  Craig S. T. Daughtry,et al.  Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery. II. Validation and applications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jun-feng Xu,et al.  Refined empirical line method to calibrate IKONOS imagery , 2006 .

[19]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Influence of the Adjacency Effect on Ground Reflectance Measurements , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[20]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and quality assessment of laboratory BRDF data , 1998 .

[21]  M. Herold,et al.  Spectral characteristics of asphalt road aging and deterioration: implications for remote-sensing applications. , 2005, Applied optics.

[22]  E. J. Milton,et al.  The Effect of Unresolved Scene Elements on the Spectral Response of Calibration Targets: An Example , 1997 .

[23]  P. Chavez.  An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data , 1988 .

[24]  Juha Suomalainen,et al.  The selection of appropriate spectrally bright pseudo-invariant ground targets for use in empirical line calibration of SPOT satellite imagery , 2011 .

[25]  A. Strahler,et al.  A review of reflectance nomenclature used in remote sensing , 2000 .

[26]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  A new method of retrieving surface bidirectional reflectance from ground measurements: Atmospheric sensitivity study , 1999 .

[27]  Juha Suomalainen,et al.  A comparison of methods for the retrieval of surface reflectance factor from multitemporal SPOT HRV, HRVIR, and HRG multispectral satellite imagery , 2010 .

[28]  James R. Wang,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of surface energy and mass balance - Results from FIFE , 1991 .

[29]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[30]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  A refined empirical line approach for reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ , 2001 .

[31]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery: Part I: Methods , 2001 .

[32]  B. Hapke.  Theory of reflectance and emittance spectroscopy , 1993 .

[33]  Joong-Sun Won,et al.  Detection and Restoration of Defective Lines in the SPOT 4 SWIR Band , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[34]  T. Malthus,et al.  The empirical line method for the atmospheric correction of IKONOS imagery , 2003 .

[35]  Conghe Song,et al.  Radiometric correction of multi-temporal Landsat data for characterization of early successional forest patterns in western Oregon , 2006 .

[36]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output , 1992 .

[37]  Teemu Hakala,et al.  Measurement of Reflectance Properties of Asphalt Surfaces and Their Usability as Reference Targets for Aerial Photos , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[38]  J. Suomalainen.  Multiangular Spectrometry and Optical Properties of Debris Covered Surfaces , 2006 .

[39]  E. M. Perry,et al.  Comparison of atmospheric modelling versus empirical line fitting for mosaicking HYDICE imagery , 2000 .

[40]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .

[41]  Petri Pellikka,et al.  Landscape analysis using multi-scale segmentation and object-oriented classification , 2009 .