The effects of a group decision support system on culturally diverse and culturally homogeneous group decision making

Abstract Considerable research has been conducted over the last decade on the effects of using Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in group decision making. Studies have examined the influence of GDSS on such variables as group task, size, quality of decision, and satisfaction with the process. However, only a few studies have focused on the use of GDSS and its interaction with group composition. This study compared the effects of group decision making, both with and without GDSS technology, on culturally diverse and homogeneous groups. Group performance was measured by the number of non-redundant, realistic ideas and the quality of solution produced in response to posed problems. The GDSS used in the study was Vision Quest. Groups using it, regardless of cultural make up, developed a significantly higher number of non-redundant, realistic ideas than groups that did not. Furthermore, among groups using the GDSS, culturally diverse groups produced a significantly higher number of non-redundant, realistic ideas than homogeneous groups that used the GDSS. Implications for diversity management and group support research are suggested.

[1]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[2]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  A group decision support system for multilingual groups , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[3]  J. Ruhe,et al.  Effects of Racial Composition On Small Work Groups , 1977 .

[4]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[5]  N. Adler.  International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[6]  V. K. Vaid-Raizada.  Management of Interethnic Conflict in an Indian Manufacturing Organization , 1985 .

[7]  David Barry,et al.  Managing the bossless team: Lessons in distributed leadership , 1991 .

[8]  Warren E. Watson,et al.  Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver , 1993 .

[9]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[10]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.

[12]  Willie E. Hopkins,et al.  Organizational Productivity 2000: A Work Force Perspective , 1991 .

[13]  Poppy Lauretta McLeod,et al.  An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  G. Hofstede.  The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept , 1984 .

[15]  E I Megargee,et al.  Influence of race on the manifestation of leadership. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Paul S. Kirkbride,et al.  Developing Conflict Management Skills in Hong Kong: An Analysis of some Cross-Cultural Implications , 1986 .

[17]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING AND GROUP SIZE , 1992 .

[18]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Computer Support for Group Versus Individual Decisions , 1982, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[19]  H. Guetzkow,et al.  A social psychology of group processes for decision-making , 1964 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  The Impact of Computer-Based Support on the Process and Outcomes of Group Decision Making , 1986, ICIS.

[21]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  The effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus inquiry methods in a GSS environment , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research , 1991 .

[23]  H. Triandis.  Cognitive Similarity and Communication in a Dyad , 1960 .

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Using a GDSS to Facilitate Group Consensus: Some Intended and Unintended Consequences , 1988, MIS Q..

[25]  Taylor Cox,et al.  The multicultural organization , 1991 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[27]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[28]  PooleMarshall Scott,et al.  Conflict Management in a Computer-Supported Meeting Environment , 1991 .

[29]  Michael McCarrey.  Work and personal values of Canadian Anglophones and Francophones: Implications for organizational behaviour. , 1988 .

[30]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Group support systems in practice: experience at IBM , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume III: Decision Support and Knowledge Based Systems Track.

[31]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[32]  Lennie Copeland.  Learning to Manage a Multicultural Work Force. , 1988 .

[33]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field Experiment , 1988, MIS Q..

[34]  Catherine Kirchmeyer,et al.  Multicultural Groups , 1992 .

[35]  H. Triandis,et al.  Member Heterogeneity and Dyadic Creativity , 1965 .