Cognitive Strategies for the Visual Search of Hierarchical Computer Displays

This article investigates the cognitive strategies that people use to search computer displays. Several different visual layouts are examined: unlabeled layouts that contain multiple groups of items but no group headings, labeled layouts in which items are grouped and each group has a useful heading, and a target-only layout that contains just one item. A number of plausible strategies were proposed for each layout. Each strategy was programmed into the EPIC cognitive architecture, producing models that simulate the human visual-perceptual, oculomotor, and cognitive processing required for the task. The models generate search time predictions. For unlabeled layouts, the mean layout search times are predicted by a purely random search strategy, and the more detailed positional search times are predicted by a noisy systematic strategy. The labeled layout search times are predicted by a hierarchical strategy in which first the group labels are systematically searched, and then the contents of the target group. The target-only layout search times are predicted by a strategy in which the eyes move directly to the sudden appearance of the target. The models demonstrate that human visual search performance can be explained largely in terms of the cognitive strategy that is used to coordinate the relevant perceptual and motor processes, a clear and useful visual hierarchy triggers a fundamentally different visual search strategy and effectively gives the user greater control over the visual navigation, and cognitive strategies will be an important component of a predictive visual search tool. The models provide insights pertaining to the visual-perceptual and oculomotor processes involved in visual search and contribute to the science base needed for predictive interface analysis.

[1]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[2]  U. Neisser Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. , 1963 .

[3]  U. Neisser VISUAL SEARCH. , 1964, Scientific American.

[4]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[5]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[6]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[7]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[8]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[9]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Minimizing User Search Time in Menu Retrieval Systems , 1985 .

[10]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Features and objects in visual processing , 1986 .

[11]  Paul S. Rosenbloom,et al.  Universal Subgoaling and Chunking , 1986 .

[12]  David E. Kieras,et al.  PPS: A Parsimonious Production System, , 1987 .

[13]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Menu Search: Random or Systematic? , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  A system for evaluating screen formats: Research and application , 1988 .

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control at the Human/Computer Interface , 1991 .

[16]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS Analysis for Predicting and Explaining Real-World Task Performance , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Alastair G. Gale,et al.  Visual search 2 , 1993 .

[19]  Nancy Staggers Impact of Screen Density on Clinical Nurses' Computer Task Performance and Subjective Screen Satisfaction , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Kevin Mullet,et al.  Designing Visual Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques , 1994 .

[21]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  GLEAN: a computer-based tool for rapid GOMS model usability evaluation of user interface designs , 1995, UIST '95.

[22]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Epic architecture: principles of operation , 1996 .

[23]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast , 1996, TCHI.

[24]  Wilbert O. Galitz,et al.  The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques , 1996 .

[25]  John R. Anderson,et al.  ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic , 1997, CHI.

[27]  David E. Kieras,et al.  An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[29]  Bonnie E. John Cognitive Modeling in Human-Computer Interaction , 1998, Graphics Interface.

[30]  D. Kieras,et al.  The role of cognitive task analysis in the application of predictive models of human performance , 1998 .

[31]  M. Pickering,et al.  Eye guidance in reading and scene perception , 1998 .

[32]  Erik Nilsen,et al.  Exploring the divide between two unified theories of cognition: modeling visual attention in menu selection , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[33]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling demonstrates how people use anticipated location knowledge of menu items , 1999, CHI '99.

[34]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Computational models of the perceptual, cognitive, and motor processes involved in the visual search of pull -down menus and computer screens , 1999 .

[35]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Supporting cognitive models as users , 2000, TCHI.

[36]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior Milliseconds Matter: an Introduction to Microstrategies and to Their Use in Describing and Predicting Interactive Behavior , 2022 .

[37]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  Embodied models as simulated users: introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Dario D. Salvucci An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[39]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  G. Woodman,et al.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Mark O. Riedl,et al.  A perception/action substrate for cognitive modeling in HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  Z. Pylyshyn Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision , 2001, Cognition.

[43]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies , 2001, TCHI.

[44]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Michael Freed,et al.  Automating CPM-GOMS , 2002, CHI.

[46]  Brian D. Ehret,et al.  Learning where to look: location learning in graphical user interfaces , 2002, CHI.

[47]  J. Findlay,et al.  Eye guidance and visual search , 1998 .