Analyzing change in students' gene-to-evolution models in college-level introductory biology

Research in contemporary biology has become increasingly complex and organized around understanding biological processes in the context of systems. To better reflect the ways of thinking required for learning about systems, we developed and implemented a pedagogical approach using box-and-arrow models (similar to concept maps) as a foundational tool for instruction and assessment in an Introductory Biology course on genetics, evolution, and ecology. Over the course of one semester, students iteratively constructed, evaluated, and revised “Gene-to-Evolution” (GtE) models intended to promote understanding about the connections linking molecular-level processes with population-level outcomes. In practice, a successful GtE model contextualizes information provided in a case study and explains how genetic-level variation originates at the molecular level, is differentially expressed among individuals, and is acted upon by the environment to produce evolutionary change within a population. Our analyses revealed that students' ability to construct biologically accurate models increased throughout the semester. Model complexity peaked near mid-term then subsequently declined. This suggests that, with time, students were building more parsimonious models, shedding irrelevant information, and improving in their ability to apply accurate and appropriate biological language to explain relationships among concepts. Importantly, we observed the greatest relative gains in model correctness among students who entered the course with lower mean GPA. In an analysis comparing performance among achievement tritiles, lower-performing students effectively closed the achievement gap with the highest performing students by the end of the semester. Our findings support the effectiveness of model-based pedagogies for science teaching and learning, and offer a perspective on pedagogical application of modeling strategies to foster systems thinking and knowledge structuring in college-level biology.

[1]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[2]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Revisiting learning difficulties in biology , 1999 .

[3]  David C. Haak,et al.  Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology , 2011, Science.

[4]  Richard Zajchowski,et al.  Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: Knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structure? , 1993 .

[5]  Cornelia Sommer,et al.  System competence – Are elementary students able to deal with a biological system? , 2012 .

[6]  Steven A. Sloman,et al.  Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure. , 2010 .

[7]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time , 2011 .

[8]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems , 2007 .

[10]  Ross H. Nehm,et al.  Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open‐response instrument, and an oral interview , 2008 .

[11]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems , 2007 .

[12]  M. Resnick,et al.  Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World , 1999 .

[13]  Martyn Stewart Joined up thinking? Evaluating the use of concept‐mapping to develop complex system learning , 2012 .

[14]  Richard Plate Assessing individuals' understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems , 2010 .

[15]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .

[16]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Understanding Complex Systems: Some Core Challenges , 2006 .

[17]  J. Mervis Undergraduate science. Weed-out courses hamper diversity. , 2011, Science.

[18]  Sarah K. Brem,et al.  Changing Minds? Implications of Conceptual Change for Teaching and Learning about Biological Evolution , 2008, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[19]  I. Kinchin,et al.  Making learning visible: the role of concept mapping in higher education , 2008 .

[20]  Judith S. Ridgway,et al.  What Do Experts and Novices “See” in Evolutionary Problems? , 2011, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[21]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps , 2010 .

[22]  Ute Harms,et al.  Assessing System Thinking Through Different Concept-Mapping Practices , 2012 .

[23]  Mike U. Smith Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues , 2010 .

[24]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Designing to Learn About Complex Systems , 2000 .

[25]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Problems and Issues in the Use of Concept Maps in Science Assessment. , 1996 .

[26]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Model building for conceptual change , 2005, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  Using Avida-ED for Teaching and Learning About Evolution in Undergraduate Introductory Biology Courses , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[28]  I. Greca,et al.  Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling , 2000 .

[29]  R. Nehm,et al.  Biology Majors' Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection , 2007 .

[30]  Maria Araceli Ruiz-Primo,et al.  Windows into the mind , 2005 .

[31]  A. Johnstone Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[32]  I. Kinchin,et al.  How a qualitative approach to concept map analysis can be used to aid learning by illustrating patterns of conceptual development , 2000 .

[33]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[34]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[35]  Eleni Stroulia,et al.  Functional device models and model-Based diagnosis in adaptive design , 1996, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[36]  P. V. Meter,et al.  Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. , 2001 .

[37]  Eric Brewe Modeling theory applied: Modeling Instruction in introductory physics , 2008 .

[38]  J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology , 1997 .

[39]  Joel J. Mintzes,et al.  Knowledge Restructuring in Biology: Testing a Punctuated Model of Conceptual Change , 2007 .

[40]  S. Vosniadou Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[41]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena , 2000 .

[42]  Elaine Martin,et al.  What university teachers teach and how they teach it , 2000 .

[43]  N. Orion,et al.  Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education , 2005 .

[44]  Lei Liu,et al.  Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia , 2009 .

[45]  Woei Hung,et al.  Enhancing systems-thinking skills with modelling , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[46]  B. Ewers,et al.  Does the Segregation of Evolution in Biology Textbooks and Introductory Courses Reinforce Students’ Faulty Mental Models of Biology and Evolution? , 2009, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[47]  Mike U. Smith Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: I. Philosophical/Epistemological Issues , 2010 .

[48]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool* , 2006, Inf. Vis..