A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals

Theories of embodied object representation predict a tight association between sensorimotor processes and visual processing of manipulable objects. Previous research has shown that object handles can ‘potentiate’ a manual response (i.e., button press) to a congruent location. This potentiation effect is taken as evidence that objects automatically evoke sensorimotor simulations in response to the visual presentation of manipulable objects. In the present series of experiments, we investigated a critical prediction of the theory of embodied object representations that potentiation effects should be observed with manipulable artifacts but not non-manipulable animals. In four experiments we show that (a) potentiation effects are observed with animals and artifacts; (b) potentiation effects depend on the absolute size of the objects and (c) task context influences the presence/absence of potentiation effects. We conclude that potentiation effects do not provide evidence for embodied object representations, but are suggestive of a more general stimulus–response compatibility effect that may depend on the distribution of attention to different object features.

[1]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[2]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Broken affordances, broken objects: A TMS study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools , 2010, Psychological science.

[6]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[7]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Action observation can prime visual object recognition , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Rapid communication: Seeing and doing: Ability to act moderates orientation effects in object perception , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  D. Bub,et al.  Priming of reach and grasp actions by handled objects. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[13]  George S. Cree,et al.  Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[16]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  B. Hommel Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[19]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[20]  Kim-Phuong L Vu,et al.  Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: Transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  When Action Turns into Words. Activation of Motor-Based Knowledge during Categorization of Manipulable Objects , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Rob Ellis,et al.  The role of visual attention in action priming , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Ed Symes,et al.  Visual object affordances: object orientation. , 2007, Acta psychologica.

[24]  D. Bub,et al.  Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Markus Graf,et al.  The role of action representations in visual object recognition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  R. Ward,et al.  S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .

[27]  Richard J. Epstein,et al.  Current perspectives in dysphasia , 1985 .

[28]  R. Proctor,et al.  Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[30]  Simon J. Thorpe,et al.  Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited , 2006, Vision Research.

[31]  S. Tipper,et al.  Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Functional links between motor and language systems , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[33]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[34]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[35]  S. Anderson,et al.  Attentional processes link perception and action , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  R. Ratcliff Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Pierre Mounoud,et al.  The influence of action perception on object recognition: a developmental study. , 2007, Developmental science.

[39]  Jefferson D. Grubb,et al.  Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  R. Proctor,et al.  Object-based correspondence effects for action-relevant and surface-property judgments with keypress responses: evidence for a basis in spatial coding , 2013, Psychological research.

[41]  Gert Westermann,et al.  Eye-tracking study of inanimate objects , 2009 .

[42]  V. Gallese,et al.  What is so special about embodied simulation? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[44]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[45]  R. Whelan Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data , 2008 .

[46]  Aaron J. Newman,et al.  The Influence of Language Proficiency on Lexical Semantic Processing in Native and Late Learners of English , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  R. Proctor,et al.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The role of apparent size in building- and object-specific regions of ventral visual cortex , 2011, Brain Research.

[49]  Lawrence A. Shapiro Embodied Cognition , 2010 .

[50]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Evidence for visuomotor priming effect , 1996, Neuroreport.

[51]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .