Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has had massive implications for the nature of work and the role technology plays in the workplace. Organisations have been forced into rapid ‘big bang’ introduction of technology and ‘tech-driven’ practices in an unprecedented and time pressured manner. In many cases there has been little training or reflection on how the practices and associated technology should be introduced and integrated or adapted to suit the new workplace context. We argue that there is a need for a more reflective ‘normalisation’ of work practices and the role technology plays. The paper draws on normalisation process theory (NPT) and its underlying components of cohesion, cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring. As an exemplar, we focus on the changing nature of work and adoption of remote working practices. The paper uses NPT to examine current thinking and approaches and offering some guidelines to inform research and practice.

[1]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Information systems in the age of pandemics: COVID-19 and beyond , 2020, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  C. May,et al.  Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory , 2009 .

[3]  Penelope Sue Greenberg,et al.  Creating and Sustaining Trust in Virtual Teams , 2007 .

[4]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[5]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  The Transformative Potential of Disruptions: A Viewpoint , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[6]  Alexander Richter,et al.  The Paradoxical Effects of Digital Artifacts on Innovation Practices , 2018 .

[7]  Neena Pandey,et al.  Impact of digital surge during Covid-19 pandemic: A viewpoint on research and practice , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[8]  C. May A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[9]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: an empirical investigation , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Study of Remote Workers and Their Differences from Non-Remote Workers , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[12]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  Evolving Information Systems and Technology Research Issues for COVID-19 and Other Pandemics , 2020, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[13]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Implementation Science Development of a Theory of Implementation and Integration: Normalization Process Theory , 2022 .

[14]  Adam Ozimek,et al.  The Future of Remote Work , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[15]  Fotini Paraskeva,et al.  Emotional intelligence and transformational leadership in virtual teams: lessons from MMOGs , 2020 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner Editorial Reflections: Lockdowns, Slow Downs, and Some Introductions , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[18]  Becky McCall,et al.  Shut down and reboot—preparing to minimise infection in a post-COVID-19 era , 2020, The Lancet Digital Health.

[19]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Virtual Teams , 2019, The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior.

[20]  Noel Carroll,et al.  Theorizing on the Normalization of Digital Transformations , 2020, ECIS.

[21]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Locked-down digital work , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[22]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Complex interventions , 2022, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

[23]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Anytime/anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work , 2002, CACM.

[24]  Christine Grant,et al.  Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach , 2018, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  S. Sarker,et al.  Seeing Remote Team Members as Leaders: A Study of US-Scandinavian Teams , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[26]  Konstantinos Pouliakas,et al.  EU Jobs at Highest Risk of Covid-19 Social Distancing: Will the Pandemic Exacerbate Labour Market Divide? , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Symeon Chatzinotas,et al.  Enabling and Emerging Technologies for Social Distancing: A Comprehensive Survey , 2020, 2005.02816.

[28]  Savvas Papagiannidis,et al.  WHO led the digital transformation of your company? A reflection of IT related challenges during the pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Information Management.

[29]  Scott Duke Kominers,et al.  Zoom Video Communications and COVID-19 , 2020 .

[30]  Guy Paré,et al.  (Re)considering the Concept of Literature Review Reproducibility , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Francesco Miele,et al.  Digital technologies and power dynamics in the organization: A conceptual review of remote working and wearable technologies at work , 2020 .

[32]  Miklós Koren,et al.  Business disruptions from social distancing , 2020, PloS one.