Cortical functional connectivity networks in normal and spinal cord injured patients: Evaluation by graph analysis

The present work aims at analyzing the structure of cortical connectivity during the attempt to move a paralyzed limb by a group of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. Connectivity patterns were obtained by means of the Directed Transfer Function applied to the cortical signals estimated from high resolution EEG recordings. Electrical activity were estimated in normals (Healthy) and SCI patients on twelve regions of interest (ROIs) coincident with Brodmann areas. Degree distributions showed the presence of few cortical regions with a lot of outgoing connections in all the cortical networks estimated irrespectively of the frequency band investigated. For both of the groups (SCI and Healthy), bilateral cingulate motor area (CMA) acts as hub transmitting information flows. The efficiency index, allowed to assert the ordered properties of such estimated cortical networks in both populations. The comparison of such estimated networks with those obtained from random networks, elicited significant differences (P < 0.05, Bonferroni‐corrected for multiple comparisons). A statistical comparison (ANOVA) between SCI patients and healthy subjects showed a significant difference (P < 0.05) between the local efficiency of their respective networks. For three frequency bands (theta 4–7 Hz, alpha 8–12 Hz, and beta 13–29 Hz) the higher value observed in the spinal cord injured population entails a larger level of internal organization and fault tolerance. This fact suggests a sort of compensative mechanism as local response to the alteration in their MIF areas, which is probably due to the indirect effects of the spinal injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Frank Harary,et al.  Graph Theory , 2016 .

[2]  G. Carter.  Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. II. Preparation and feedback. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. I. Methods and analysis of stimulus- and response-locked data. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  W. J. Nowack.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995, Neurology.

[7]  K Shinosaki,et al.  Inter-site EEG relationships before widespread epileptiform discharges. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[8]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  A. Urbano,et al.  Dynamic functional coupling of high resolution EEG potentials related to unilateral internally triggered one-digit movements. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  C. Uhl.  Analysis of neurophysiological brain functioning , 1999 .

[13]  Danny Dolev,et al.  Fault tolerance in the cardiac ganglion of the lobster , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[15]  S. G. Andino,et al.  Distributed Source Models: Standard Solutions and New Developments , 1999 .

[16]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[17]  M P Young,et al.  Anatomical connectivity defines the organization of clusters of cortical areas in the macaque monkey and the cat. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[19]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[20]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Martin E. Schwab,et al.  Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[23]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[24]  C. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets , 2002 .

[25]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond , 2003 .

[26]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Economic small-world behavior in weighted networks , 2003 .

[27]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole‐head MEG recordings of healthy subjects , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[29]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  C. J. Stam,et al.  Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a ‘small-world’ network? , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Estimation of the cortical functional connectivity with the multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and fMRI data by directed transfer function , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Assessing cortical functional connectivity by linear inverse estimation and directed transfer function: simulations and application to real data , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Cornelis J. Stam,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of resting-state functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, NeuroImage.

[36]  C. Stam,et al.  Using graph theoretical analysis of multi channel EEG to evaluate the neural efficiency hypothesis , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[37]  C. Stam,et al.  Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The small world of the cerebral cortex , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[39]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Comparison of different cortical connectivity estimators for high‐resolution EEG recordings , 2007, Human brain mapping.