Plant functional traits and the multidimensional nature of species coexistence

Significance Biologists have long understood that differences between species in traits such as bill shape or rooting depth can maintain diversity in communities by promoting specialization and reducing competition. Here we test the assumption that phenotypic differences drive the stabilizing niche differences that promote coexistence. Using advances in ecological theory and detailed experiments we quantify average fitness and stabilizing niche differences between 102 plant species pairs and relate these differences to 11 functional traits. Individual traits were correlated with fitness differences that drive competitive exclusion but not stabilizing niche differences that promote coexistence. Stabilizing niche differences could only be described by combinations of traits, representing differentiation in multiple dimensions. This challenges the simplistic use of trait patterns to infer community assembly. Understanding the processes maintaining species diversity is a central problem in ecology, with implications for the conservation and management of ecosystems. Although biologists often assume that trait differences between competitors promote diversity, empirical evidence connecting functional traits to the niche differences that stabilize species coexistence is rare. Obtaining such evidence is critical because traits also underlie the average fitness differences driving competitive exclusion, and this complicates efforts to infer community dynamics from phenotypic patterns. We coupled field-parameterized mathematical models of competition between 102 pairs of annual plants with detailed sampling of leaf, seed, root, and whole-plant functional traits to relate phenotypic differences to stabilizing niche and average fitness differences. Single functional traits were often well correlated with average fitness differences between species, indicating that competitive dominance was associated with late phenology, deep rooting, and several other traits. In contrast, single functional traits were poorly correlated with the stabilizing niche differences that promote coexistence. Niche differences could only be described by combinations of traits, corresponding to differentiation between species in multiple ecological dimensions. In addition, several traits were associated with both fitness differences and stabilizing niche differences. These complex relationships between phenotypic differences and the dynamics of competing species argue against the simple use of single functional traits to infer community assembly processes but lay the groundwork for a theoretically justified trait-based community ecology.

[1]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[2]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Evolutionary history and the strength of species interactions: testing the phylogenetic limiting similarity hypothesis. , 2014, Ecology.

[3]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[4]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology Letters.

[5]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[6]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[7]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Species Competition and Predation , 2013 .

[8]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[9]  Feike Schieving,et al.  Functional traits determine trade-offs and niches in a tropical forest community , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Cyrille Violle,et al.  Phylogenetic limiting similarity and competitive exclusion. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[11]  Roger M Nisbet,et al.  Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. , 2011, Ecology.

[12]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[14]  M. Fischer,et al.  A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[15]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[16]  J. Shurin,et al.  Trait-based assembly and phylogenetic structure in northeast Pacific rockfish assemblages. , 2009, Ecology.

[17]  B. Enquist,et al.  Opposing assembly mechanisms in a neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. , 2009, Ecology.

[18]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Functional tradeoffs determine species coexistence via the storage effect , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest , 2008, Science.

[20]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests. , 2008, Ecology.

[21]  James S. Clark,et al.  Resolving the biodiversity paradox. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[22]  J. Klironomos,et al.  Influence of Phylogeny on Fungal Community Assembly and Ecosystem Functioning , 2007, Science.

[23]  Peter B Adler,et al.  A niche for neutrality. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[24]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  Plant coexistence and the niche , 2004 .

[27]  F. Frentiu.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2004 .

[28]  J. Bastow Wilson,et al.  Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community , 2004 .

[29]  R. S. Burton,et al.  Distribution of plants in a California serpentine grassland: are rocky hummocks spatial refuges for native species? , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[30]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  MULTIPLE TRAIT ASSOCIATIONS IN RELATION TO HABITAT DIFFERENTIATION AMONG 17 FLORIDIAN OAK SPECIES , 2004 .

[31]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[32]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[33]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2003 .

[34]  John P. O'Neill,et al.  A MORPHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF AVIAN COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION , 2003 .

[35]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[36]  P. Chesson.  Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[37]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  A Method Of Linking Multivariate Community Structure To Environmental Variables , 1993 .

[38]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Geometry, heterogeneity and competition in variable environments , 1990 .

[39]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[40]  David Tilman.  Resource Competition and Community Structure. (MPB-17), Volume 17 , 1982 .

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[42]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.