Obtaining Relevant Genes by Analysis of Expression Arrays with a Multi-agent System

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer. Despite treatment with chemotherapy, relapses are frequent and response to these treatments is not the same in younger women as in older women. Therefore, the identification of genes that provoke this disease is required, as well as the identification of therapeutic targets. There are currently different hybridization techniques, such as expression ar-rays, which measure the signal expression of both the genomic and tran-scriptomic levels of thousands of genes of a given sample. Probesets of Gene 1.0 ST GeneChip arrays provide the ultimate genome transcript coverage, providing a measurement of the expression level of the sample. This paper proposes a multi-agent system to manage information of expres-sion arrays, with the goal of providing an intuitive system that is also extensible to analyze and interpret the results. The roles of agent integrate different types of techniques, from statistical and data mining techniques that select a set of genes, to search techniques that find pathways in which such genes participate, and information extraction techniques that apply a CBR system to check if these genes are involved in the disease.

[1]  Yi Xing,et al.  Exon arrays provide accurate assessments of gene expression , 2007, Genome Biology.

[2]  Shi-Hua Zhang,et al.  Discovery of co-occurring driver pathways in cancer , 2014, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Javier Bajo,et al.  aCGH-MAS: Analysis of aCGH by means of Multiagent System , 2015, BioMed research international.

[4]  Javier Bajo,et al.  Model of experts for decision support in the diagnosis of leukemia patients , 2009, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[5]  Tu-Bao Ho,et al.  Detecting disease genes based on semi-supervised learning and protein-protein interaction networks , 2012, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[6]  See-Kiong Ng,et al.  InterDom: a database of putative interacting protein domains for validating predicted protein interactions and complexes , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Patrick G Buckley,et al.  Genomic microarrays in the spotlight. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[8]  Graziano Pesole,et al.  Selection of relevant genes in cancer diagnosis based on their prediction accuracy , 2007, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[9]  Yee Wen Choon,et al.  A hybrid of bees algorithm and flux balance analysis with OptKnock as a platform for in silico optimization of microbial strains , 2013, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[10]  Steen Knudsen Cancer Diagnostics with DNA Microarrays: Knudsen/Cancer Diagnostics with DNA Microarrays , 2006 .

[11]  Estefania Argente,et al.  An abstract architecture for virtual organizations: The THOMAS approach , 2011, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[12]  S. Weintraub,et al.  Wnt Antagonist SFRP1 Functions as a Secreted Mediator of Senescence , 2012, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[13]  Lincoln Stein,et al.  Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Mark A. van de Wiel,et al.  Microarray Data Analysis: From Hypotheses to Conclusions Using Gene Expression Data , 2004, Cellular oncology : the official journal of the International Society for Cellular Oncology.

[15]  Javier Bajo,et al.  MicroCBR: A case-based reasoning architecture for the classification of microarray data , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  E. Winzeler,et al.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays , 2000, Nature.

[17]  E. Dermitzakis From gene expression to disease risk , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[18]  B Marshall,et al.  Gene Ontology Consortium: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  DNA microarrays , 2005, Endocrine.

[20]  E. Birney,et al.  Pfam: the protein families database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[21]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer genes and the pathways they control , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[22]  L. Holm,et al.  The Pfam protein families database , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  D. Pinkel,et al.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data. , 2005, Biostatistics.

[25]  David E. Booth Cancer Diagnostics With DNA Microarrays , 2007, Technometrics.

[26]  B. Ylstra,et al.  BAC to the future! or oligonucleotides: a perspective for micro array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) , 2006, Nucleic acids research.