Measurement of sound power and absorption in reverberation chambers using energy density.

Reverberation chamber measurements typically rely upon spatially averaged squared pressure for the calculation of sound absorption, sound power, and other acoustic values. While a reverberation chamber can provide an approximately diffuse sound field, variations in sound pressure consistently produce uncertainty in measurement results. This paper explores the benefits of using total energy density or squared particle velocity magnitude (kinetic energy density) instead of squared pressure (potential energy density) for sound absorption and sound power measurements. The approaches are based on methods outlined in current ISO standards. The standards require a sufficient number of source-receiver locations to obtain suitable measurement results. The total and kinetic energy densities exhibit greater spatial uniformity at most frequencies than potential energy density, thus requiring fewer source-receiver positions to produce effective results. Because the total energy density is typically the most uniform of the three quantities at low frequencies, its use could also impact the usable low-frequency ranges of reverberation chambers. In order to employ total and kinetic energy densities for sound absorption measurements, relevant energy-based impulse responses were developed as part of the work for the assessment of sound field decays.

[2]  R. K. Cook,et al.  Diffuse sound fields: Eigenmode and free‐wave models , 1976 .

[3]  Carl F. Eyring,et al.  Reverberation Time in “Dead” Rooms , 1930 .

[4]  Jiri Tichy,et al.  Effect of rotating diffusers and sampling techniques on sound‐pressure averaging in reverberation rooms , 1974 .

[5]  H. Saunders,et al.  Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[6]  M. Schroeder.  New Method of Measuring Reverberation Time , 1965 .

[7]  F. Fahy.  Measurement of acoustic intensity using the cross‐spectral density of two microphone signals , 1977 .

[8]  Allan D. Pierce,et al.  Acoustics , 1989 .

[9]  K. Heinrich Kuttruff.  Sound decay in reverberation chambers with diffusing elements , 1981 .

[10]  de Hans-Elias Bree,et al.  An overview of microflown technologies , 2003 .

[11]  David Lubman.  Fluctuations of Sound with Position in a Reverberant Room , 1968 .

[12]  D. Bonsi,et al.  Quadraphonic impulse responses for acoustic enhancement of audio tracks : measurement and analysis , 2005 .

[13]  Ron Raangs,et al.  Exploring the use of the microflown , 2005 .

[14]  Justin Ghan,et al.  Expression for the estimation of time-averaged acoustic energy density using the two-microphone method. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Parkins,et al.  Narrowband and broadband active control in an enclosure using the acoustic energy density , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W. T. Chu.  Eigenmode analysis of the interference patterns in reverberant sound fields , 1980 .

[17]  Richard V. Waterhouse,et al.  Interference Patterns in Reverberant Sound Fields. II , 1955 .

[18]  Richard V. Waterhouse,et al.  Statistical Properties of Reverberant Sound Fields , 1963 .

[19]  Richard K. Cook.  New method for measurement of the total energy density of sound waves , 1974 .

[20]  Nicola Prodi,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF NEW ENERGETIC PARAMETERS FOR THE OBJECTIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF AN OPERA HOUSE , 2000 .

[21]  Murray Hodgson.  On measures to increase sound‐field diffuseness and the applicability of diffuse‐field theory , 1994 .

[22]  Philip A. Nelson,et al.  Active Control of Sound , 1992 .

[23]  David Nutter.  Sound Absorption and Sound Power Measurements in Reverberation Chambers Using Energy Density Methods , 2006 .