Risk-informed approach to the safety improvement of the reactor protection system of the AGN-201K research reactor

Abstract Periodic safety reviews (PSRs) are conducted on operating nuclear power plants (NPPs) and have been mandated also for research reactors in Korea, in response to the Fukushima accident. One safety review tool, the probabilistic safety assessment (PSA), aims to identify weaknesses in the design and operation of the research reactor, and to evaluate and compare possible safety improvements. However, the PSA for research reactors is difficult due to scarce data availability. An important element in the analysis of research reactors is the reactor protection system (RPS), with its functionality and importance. In this view, we consider that of the AGN-201K, a zero-power reactor without forced decay heat removal systems, to demonstrate a risk-informed safety improvement study. By incorporating risk- and safety-significance importance measures, and sensitivity and uncertainty analyses, the proposed method identifies critical components in the RPS reliability model, systematically proposes potential safety improvements and ranks them to assist in the decision-making process.

[1]  Geun-Ok Park,et al.  A Quantitative Reliability Analysis of FPGA-based Controller for applying to Nuclear Instrumentation and Control System , 2014 .

[2]  Hyeonmin Kim,et al.  Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Ji-Yong Oh,et al.  Risk-informed approach for design optimization during low power and shutdown operation , 2019, Annals of Nuclear Energy.

[4]  Gyunyoung Heo,et al.  Risk Informed Design of I&C Architecture for Research Reactors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Z W Birnbaum,et al.  ON THE IMPORTANCE OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS IN A MULTICOMPONENT SYSTEM , 1968 .

[6]  Tadakuni Hakata,et al.  Seismic PSA method for multiple nuclear power plants in a site , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Jerry C. Whitaker Power Vacuum Tubes Handbook , 1994 .

[8]  N. A. Walter,et al.  Component Failure Rates and Their Role in Reliability Prediction , 1971 .

[9]  W. E. Vesely,et al.  Principles of resource-effectiveness and regulatory-effectiveness for risk-informed applications: , 1999 .

[10]  George E. Apostolakis,et al.  Risk-informed design guidance for future reactor systems , 2005 .

[11]  Hisashi Ninokata,et al.  Risk-informed design of IRIS using a level-1 probabilistic risk assessment from its conceptual design phase , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  M. Cheok,et al.  Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications , 1998 .

[13]  W. E. Vesely,et al.  Developments in risk-informed decision-making for nuclear power plants , 1999 .

[14]  Dominique Vasseur,et al.  A practical methodology for modeling and estimation of common cause failure parameters in multi-unit nuclear PSA model , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Gyunyoung Heo,et al.  Risk-Informed Design of Hybrid I&C Architectures for Research Reactors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  Bong-Jin Yum,et al.  Development and evaluation of an uncertainty importance measure in fault tree analysis , 1997 .

[17]  B. Shimizu,et al.  Reliability Analysis Of Nuclear Power Plant Protective Systems. , 1967 .

[18]  M. van der Borst,et al.  An overview of PSA importance measures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..