The exogenous factors affecting the cost efficiency of power generation

This paper employs a stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to examine cost efficiency and scale economies in Taiwan Power Company (TPC) by using the panel data covering the period of 1995-2006. In most previous studies, the efficiency estimated by the Panel Data without testing the endogeneity may bring about a biased estimator resulting from the correlation between input and individual effect. A Hausman test is conducted in this paper to examine the endogeneity of input variables and thus an appropriate model is selected based on the test result. This study finds that the power generation executes an increasing return to scale across all the power plants based on the pooled data. We also use installed capacity, service years of the power plant, and type of fuel as explanatory variable for accounting for the estimated cost efficiency of each plant by a logistic regression model to examine the factor affecting the individual efficiency estimates. The results demonstrate that the variable of installed capacity keeps a positive relationship with cost efficiency while the factor of working years has a negative relationship.

[1]  Adnan Kasman,et al.  Cost efficiency in the Latin American and Caribbean banking systems , 2005 .

[2]  R. Kopp,et al.  Frontier production function estimates for steam electric generation: a comparative analysis , 1980 .

[3]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[4]  Loretta J. Mester A study of bank efficiency taking into account risk-preferences , 1996 .

[5]  W. Greene,et al.  Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  Toru Hattori,et al.  Relative Performance of U.S. and Japanese Electricity Distribution: An Application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis , 2003 .

[7]  W. Seitz Productive Efficiency in the Steam-Electric Generating Industry , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Adonis Yatchew,et al.  Incentive Regulation of Distributing Utilities Using Yardstick Competition , 2001 .

[9]  Badi H. Baltagi,et al.  Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator , 2003 .

[10]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Stochastic frontier analysis , 2000 .

[11]  L. Hiebert,et al.  The Determinants of the Cost Efficiency of Electric Generating Plants: A Stochastic Frontier Approach , 2002 .

[12]  Christopher J. Hammond Privatisation and the Efficiency of Decentralised Electricity Generation: Some Evidence from Inter-war Britain , 1992 .

[13]  Youngho Chang,et al.  Efficiency and deregulation of the electricity market in Singapore , 2006 .

[14]  S. Sen,et al.  An analysis of capacity and price trajectories for the Ontario electricity market using dynamic Nash equilibrium under uncertainty , 2008 .

[15]  B. Baltagi,et al.  Econometric Analysis of Panel Data , 2020, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[16]  Adonis Yatchew,et al.  Scale economies in electricity distribution: a semiparametric analysis , 2000 .

[17]  M. Wohar,et al.  Regulation, Scale Economies, and Productivity in Steam-Electric Generation , 1983 .

[18]  Rodrigo Taborda,et al.  Perfomance and Efficiency in Colombia's Power Distribution Sistem: Effects of the 1994 Reform , 2006 .