Serum tumor markers in colorectal cancer staging, grading, and follow‐up

Early diagnosis of colorectal cancer, a frequent neoplasia in industrialized countries, permits curative surgery. In this study we assessed the clinical role of serum tumor markers determination in diagnosing, staging, and grading colorectal cancer; the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19‐9, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) and CA 72‐4 in colorectal cancer follow‐up was also assessed. In 114 patients with colorectal cancer, the oncofetal antigen CEA was compared with the membrane‐associated glycoproteins CA 19‐9, CA 242, and CA 72‐4 and with the cytokeratins TPA, tissue polypeptide‐specific antigen (TPS) and tissue polypeptide monoclonal antigen (TPM). Overall, the most sensitive indices were TPA and TPS (67% and 70%, respectively). Tumor stage influenced the levels of CEA, CA 19‐9, and TPA, but not those of TPS, while tumor grade influenced CEA and TPS, but not CA 72‐4, TPA, and TPM. TPA was the most sensitive index in identifying early or well‐differentiated colorectal cancers. The sensitivity was enhanced when this marker was determined in combination with CEA, in diagnosing both advanced and early colorectal tumors. Seventy‐seven patients were followed up after therapy for at least 18 months. CEA was the most sensitive index of recurrence (58%); however, this sensitivity is too low to consider tumor markers useful in colorectal cancer follow‐up. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Plebani,et al.  Is CA242 really a new tumour marker for pancreatic adenocarcinoma? , 1995, Oncology.

[2]  M. Plebani,et al.  Clinical evaluation of seven tumour markers in lung cancer diagnosis: can any combination improve the results? , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  R. A. Baker,et al.  The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  P. Finan,et al.  The role of CA-242 and CEA in surveillance following curative resection for colorectal cancer. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  M. Pääkkönen,et al.  Clinical evaluation of serum tumour markers CEA, CA 50 and CA 242 in colorectal cancer. , 1994, Anticancer research.

[6]  C. Grossi,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum and bile of colorectal cancer patients with or without detectable liver metastases. , 1994, Anticancer research.

[7]  J. Y. Wang,et al.  Value of carcinoembryonic antigen in the management of colorectal cancer , 1994, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[8]  M. Plebani,et al.  Clinical utility of TPS, TPA and CA 19-9 measurement in pancreatic cancer. , 1993, Oncology.

[9]  F. Guadagni,et al.  TAG‐72 (CA 72‐4 assay) as a complementary serum tumor antigen to carcinoembryonic antigen in monitoring patients with colorectal cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[10]  K. Iemura,et al.  A comparative analysis of the serum levels of NCC-ST-439, CEA and CA19-9 in patients with colorectal carcinoma. , 1993, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  Y. Kodera,et al.  Expression of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and nonspecific crossreacting antigen (NCA) in gastrointestinal cancer; the correlation with degree of differentiation. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  A. Kok,et al.  Evaluation of colorectal cancer-associated mucin CA M43 assay in serum. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  K. Huber,et al.  Clinical value of determination of urokinase-type plasminogen activator antigen in plasma for detection of colorectal cancer: comparison with circulating tumor-associated antigens CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen. , 1993, Cancer research.

[14]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Comparison of four serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  A. Andrén-sandberg,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of CA242 in gastro-intestinal cancer. A comparison with CEA, CA50 and CA 19-9. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  G. Pravettoni,et al.  Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and objective response to treatment in solid tumors , 1992, The International journal of biological markers.

[17]  F. Guadagni,et al.  Tumor‐associated glycoprotein‐72 serum levels complement carcinoembryonic antigen levels in monitoring patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma. A lingitudinal study , 1991, Cancer.

[18]  P. Sammartino,et al.  Gastrointestinal cancer follow-up: the effectiveness of sequential CEA, TPA and Ca 19-9 evaluation in the early diagnosis of recurrences. , 1991, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[19]  J. Minton Technical surgical considerations for CEA directed second-look operations and hepatic tumor excision. , 1991, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[20]  B. Vogelstein,et al.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis , 1990, Cell.

[21]  P. Astone,et al.  Advanced colon cancer: staging and prognosis by CEA test. , 1990, Oncology.

[22]  T. Klug,et al.  Purification and composition of a novel gastrointestinal tumor-associated glycoprotein expressing sialylated lacto-N-fucopentaose II (CA 19-9). , 1988, Cancer research.

[23]  A. Piccoli,et al.  Tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) in pancreatic cancer diagnosis. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells , 1982, Cell.

[25]  B. Björklund Tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA): Biology, biochemistry, improved assay methodology, clinical significance in cancer and other conditions, and future outlook. , 1978, Antibiotics and chemotherapy.