Dynamic allocation of same-day requests in multi-physician primary care practices in the presence of prescheduled appointments

Appointments in primary care are of two types: 1) prescheduled appointments, which are booked in advance of a given workday; and 2) same-day appointments, which are booked as calls come during the workday. The challenge for practices is to provide preferred time slots for prescheduled appointments and yet see as many same-day patients as possible during regular work hours. It is also important, to the extent possible, to match same-day patients with their own providers (so as to maximize continuity of care). In this paper, we present a mathematical framework (a stochastic dynamic program) for same-day patient allocation in multi-physician practices in which calls for same-day appointments come in dynamically over a workday. Allocation decisions have to be made in the presence of prescheduled appointments and without complete demand information. The objective is to maximize a weighted measure that includes the number of same-day patients seen during regular work hours as well as the continuity provided to these patients. Our experimental design is motivated by empirical data we collected at a 3-provider family medicine practice in Massachusetts. Our results show that the location of prescheduled appointments – i.e. where in the day these appointments are booked – has a significant impact on the number of same-day patients a practice can see during regular work hours, as well as the continuity the practice is able to provide. We find that a 2-Blocks policy which books prescheduled appointments in two clusters – early morning and early afternoon – works very well. We also provide a simple, easily implementable policy for schedulers to assign incoming same-day requests to appointment slots. Our results show that this policy provides near-optimal same-day assignments in a variety of settings.

[1]  Hoangmai H Pham,et al.  Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. , 2010, Health affairs.

[2]  Paul Intrevado,et al.  Effects of clinical characteristics on successful open access scheduling , 2007, Health care management science.

[3]  James Stahl,et al.  Improving Clinical Access and Continuity through Physician Panel Redesign , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[4]  D. Berwick,et al.  Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. , 2003, JAMA.

[5]  Ana Muriel,et al.  The impact of provider flexibility and capacity allocation on the performance of primary care practices , 2011, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal.

[6]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Performance Metrics for Advanced Access , 2006, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[7]  Nan Liu,et al.  Dynamic Scheduling of Outpatient Appointments Under Patient No-Shows and Cancellations , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Revenue Management for a Primary-Care Clinic in the Presence of Patient Choice , 2008, Oper. Res..

[9]  Hari Balasubramanian,et al.  The impact of case mix on timely access to appointments in a primary care group practice , 2012, Health Care Management Science.

[10]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Adaptive Appointment Systems with Patient Preferences , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[11]  Kumar Muthuraman,et al.  A stochastic overbooking model for outpatient clinical scheduling with no-shows , 2008 .

[12]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  Matching daily healthcare provider capacity to demand in advanced access scheduling systems , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  L. Green,et al.  Reducing Delays for Medical Appointments: A Queueing Approach , 2008, Oper. Res..

[14]  L. Green,et al.  Providing timely access to care: what is the right patient panel size? , 2007, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[15]  Kumar Muthuraman,et al.  Sequential clinical scheduling with patient no-shows and general service time distributions , 2010 .

[16]  Stephen R. Lawrence,et al.  Clinic Overbooking to Improve Patient Access and Increase Provider Productivity , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[17]  Lawrence W. Robinson,et al.  A Comparison of Traditional and Open-Access Policies for Appointment Scheduling , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..