Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides.

Traditionally, sperms are isolated from vaginal cell mixtures by preferential extraction methods. Although these methods work well when there is a reasonable amount of DNA present, they are problematic when there are limited amounts (ca. 250 pg). In particular, the analysis of sperm from microscope slides has proven difficult. Here, we describe the use of laser capture microdissection (LM) for the isolation of spermatozoa from microscope slides containing sperms and vaginal cells. Such slides are frequently an important source of evidential material during the forensic investigation of rape and other sexual assaults. Low copy number (LCN) PCR was used to compare profiles of sperm DNA prepared using LM and preferential lysis. LM was found to outperform preferential lysis in 15 out of 16 samples. The application of LM to the processing of actual casework slides, and in particular the potential use of LM for the analysis of old cases, is discussed. Finally, 77 post-coital slides were processed in order to accurately assess the robustness of the technique. There was a significant association between the quality of the male profile recovered and time since intercourse that was independent of the number of sperms analysed, suggesting that the DNA was degraded even though the spermhead was intact.

[1]  M. Bauer,et al.  Paternity testing after pregnancy termination using laser microdissection of chorionic villi , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[2]  K Elliott,et al.  Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides. , 2003 .

[3]  G. Willott,et al.  Spermatozoa--their persistence after sexual intercourse. , 1982, Forensic science international.

[4]  M. Francolini,et al.  Evidence for nuclear internalization of exogenous DNA into mammalian sperm cells , 1993, Molecular reproduction and development.

[5]  P Gill,et al.  A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[6]  D. Demetrick,et al.  Laser Capture Microdissection–Guided Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Flow Cytometric Cell Cycle Analysis of Purified Nuclei from Paraffin Sections , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[7]  B. Weir,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  S Curran,et al.  Laser capture microscopy , 2000, Molecular pathology : MP.

[9]  A. Davies,et al.  The persistence of seminal constituents in the human vagina. , 1974, Forensic science.

[10]  R. Sparkes,et al.  Validation of the AMPFlSTR SGM plus system for use in forensic casework. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[11]  J Buckleton,et al.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[12]  K. Sullivan Forensic applications of DNA fingerprinting , 1994, Molecular biotechnology.

[13]  I W Evett,et al.  A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases. , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[14]  M. Jackson,et al.  Gene expression profiles of laser-captured adjacent neuronal subtypes , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[15]  R. Greenberg Biometry , 1969, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[16]  A I Morrison,et al.  Persistence of spermatozoa in the vagina and cervix. , 1972, The British journal of venereal diseases.

[17]  C. Spadafora Sperm cells and foreign DNA: a controversial relation. , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  David J. Werrett,et al.  Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.