On the consequences of non linear constitutive modelling of brain tissue for injury prediction with numerical head models

The objective of this work was to investigate the influences of constitutive non linearities of brain tissue in numerical head model simulations by comparing the performance of a recently developed non linear constitutive model [10, 11] with a simplified version, based on neo-Hookean elastic behaviour, and with a previously developed constitutive model [6]. Numerical simulation results from an existing 3D head model in the explicit Finite Element code MADYMO were compared. A head model containing a sliding interface between the brain and the skull was used and results were compared with the results obtained with a previously validated version possessing a tied skull-brain interface. For these head models, the effects of different constitutive models were systematically investigated for different loading directions and varying loading amplitudes in both translation and rotation. In the case of the simplified and fully non linear version of the model of Hrapko et al. [10, 11], the response predicted with a head model for varying conditions (i.e. severity and type of loading) varies consistently with the constitutive behaviour. Consequently, when used in a finite element head model, the response can be scaled according to the constitutive model used. However, the differences found when using the non linear model of Brands et al. [5] were dependent on the loading conditions. Hence this model is less suitable for use in a numerical head model.

[1]  J S H M Wismans,et al.  Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in compression and shear. , 2008, Biorheology.

[2]  Scott Tashman,et al.  Brain/skull relative displacement magnitude due to blunt head impact: new experimental data and model , 1999 .

[3]  M. Wald,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[4]  R L Stalnaker,et al.  A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. , 1995, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  P V S Lee,et al.  Modified Bilston nonlinear viscoelastic model for finite element head injury studies. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Rémy Willinger,et al.  Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms , 2003 .

[7]  R. Willinger,et al.  Shear Properties of Brain Tissue over a Frequency Range Relevant for Automotive Impact Situations: New Experimental Results. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[8]  J. Langlois,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths , 2006 .

[9]  C. L. Morfey,et al.  PRESSURE AND SHEAR RESPONSES IN BRAIN INJURY MODELS , 2001 .

[10]  M. Prange,et al.  Regional, directional, and age-dependent properties of the brain undergoing large deformation. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  A. Nahum,et al.  Intracranial Pressure Dynamics During Head Impact , 1977 .

[12]  P. Bovendeerd,et al.  Design and numerical implementation of a 3-D non-linear viscoelastic constitutive model for brain tissue during impact. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of brain tissue: large strain response and constitutive modelling. , 2006, Biorheology.

[14]  S. Margulies,et al.  A transversely isotropic viscoelastic constitutive equation for brainstem undergoing finite deformation. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  David F Meaney,et al.  Traumatic Axonal Injury Induces Proteolytic Cleavage of the Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels Modulated by Tetrodotoxin and Protease Inhibitors , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  N. Phan-Thien,et al.  Large strain behaviour of brain tissue in shear: some experimental data and differential constitutive model. , 2001, Biorheology.

[17]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Protection of the head and neck in sports. , 1962, JAMA.

[18]  J. Versace A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[19]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[20]  K. Chinzei,et al.  Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  B. Donnelly,et al.  Shear properties of human brain tissue. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  J. van Dommelen,et al.  The influence of test conditions on characterization of the mechanical properties of brain tissue. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  Jac Wismans,et al.  MODELING OF THE HUMAN HEAD UNDER IMPACT CONDITIONS: A PARAMETRIC STUDY , 1997 .

[24]  Svein Kleiven,et al.  Consequences of Reduced Brain Volume Following Impact in Prediction of Subdural Hematoma Evaluated with Numerical Techniques , 2002 .

[25]  Kurosh Darvish,et al.  On the importance of nonlinearity of brain tissue under large deformations. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[26]  Jac S H M Wismans,et al.  On the potential importance of non-linear viscoelastic material modelling for numerical prediction of brain tissue response: test and application. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.