The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language

It is argued in this paper that equative sentences in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL) conform to the general schema of (NP) NP+(PI+)NP, parenthesis marking optionality of elements. With respect to this schema, it is further argued, (a) that the function of the first NP in equative sentences is always topic; (b) that topics are marked syntactically, prosodically, and morphologically in FinSL; (c) that the preferred organisation of equative sentences in general is topic-comment; (d) that there are two structurally distinct topic-comment structures in FinSL, one having the topic at the beginning of the clause and the other having the topic in the left-detached clause-external position; (e) that the double-indexing phenomenon (cf. pronoun copy) is functionally a means to increase textual cohesion; and (f) that the sign PI in equative sentences is a certainty expressing modal device, although it may be in the process of grammaticalising into a copula.

[1]  Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen,et al.  Space in Danish sign language : the semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language , 1993 .

[2]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. , 2000 .

[3]  Hadumod Bussmann,et al.  Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics , 2000 .

[4]  Regina Pustet,et al.  Copulas: Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon , 2003 .

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[6]  Päivi Rainò.  Henkilöviittomien synty ja kehitys suomalaisessa viittomakieliyhteisössä , 2005 .

[7]  Myriam Vermeerbergen,et al.  The repetition of signs in Flemish Sign Language , 1992 .

[8]  P. Boyes-Braem,et al.  The Hands are the Head of the Mouth , 2002 .

[9]  Auli Hakulinen.  Iso suomen kielioppi , 2004 .

[10]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[11]  P. Siple,et al.  Theoretical issues in sign language research , 1990 .

[12]  David Brazil,et al.  口语语法 = A grammar of speech , 1995 .

[13]  Paul Kroeger,et al.  Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach , 2004 .

[14]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[15]  Scott K. Liddell.  American Sign Language Syntax , 1981 .

[16]  C. Habel,et al.  Language , 1931, NeuroImage.

[17]  Bencie Woll,et al.  The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction , 1999 .

[18]  Cecile McKee.  The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima (review) , 2001 .

[19]  Bencie Woll,et al.  The sign that dares to speak its name: echo phonology in British Sign Language , 2001 .

[20]  K. Emmorey,et al.  The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure by Carol Neidle et al. , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Van Valin,et al.  Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface: List of abbreviations , 2005 .

[22]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[23]  Ferdinand de Saussure.  Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[24]  Ángel Herrero-Blanco,et al.  Non-verbal predicability and copula support rule in Spanish Sign Language , 2005 .

[25]  Lc Day,et al.  Mouthings and Mouth Gestures in British Sign Language , 2001 .