Determination of Femoral Neck Angle and Torsion Angle Utilizing a Novel Three-Dimensional Modeling and Analytical Technology Based on CT Datasets

Introduction Exact knowledge of femoral neck inclination and torsion angles is important in recognizing, understanding and treating pathologic conditions in the hip joint. However, published results vary widely between different studies, which indicates that there are persistent difficulties in carrying out exact measurements. Methods A three dimensional modeling and analytical technology was used for the analysis of 1070 CT datasets of skeletally mature femurs. Individual femoral neck angles and torsion angles were precisely computed, in order to establish whether gender, age, body mass index and ethnicity influence femoral neck angles and torsion angles. Results The median femoral neck angle was 122.2° (range 100.1–146.2°, IQR 117.9–125.6°). There are significant gender (female 123.0° vs. male 121.5°; p = 0.007) and ethnic (Asian 123.2° vs. Caucasian 121.9°; p = 0.0009) differences. The median femoral torsion angle was 14.2° (-23.6–48.7°, IQR 7.4–20.4°). There are significant gender differences (female 16.4° vs. male 12.1°; p = 0.0001). Femoral retroversion was found in 7.8% of the subjects. Conclusion Precise femoral neck and torsion angles were obtained in over one thousand cases. Systematic deviations in measurement due to human error were eliminated by using automated high accuracy morphometric analysis. Small but significant gender and ethnic differences were found in femoral neck and torsion angles.

[1]  John D. Koerner,et al.  Femoral Version of the General Population: Does “Normal” Vary by Gender or Ethnicity? , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[2]  Y. Rhee,et al.  Differences in femoral neck geometry associated with age and ethnicity , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  J. Davids,et al.  Femoral Anteversion in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Assessment with Two and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  K. Zou,et al.  Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  L. C. Hollister,et al.  A new method for determination of torsion of the femur. , 1953, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  L BILLING,et al.  Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents; a standardized technique also suitable for determination of the collum-, anteversion-, and epiphyseal angles; a study of slipped epiphysis and coxa plana. , 1954, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[7]  D. Collopy,et al.  Development and verification of a cementless novel tapered wedge stem for total hip arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  J. Ravlić-Gulan,et al.  Femoral neck anteversion: values, development, measurement, common problems. , 2000, Collegium antropologicum.

[9]  B. Morrey,et al.  Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[10]  O. Mahoney,et al.  Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  D. Cooperman,et al.  Are the Left and Right Proximal Femurs Symmetric? , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  F G Parsons,et al.  The Characters of the English Thigh-Bone. , 1914, Journal of anatomy and physiology.

[13]  Nils Reimers,et al.  Automated Morphometric Analysis of the Femur on Large AnatomicalDatabases with Highly Accurate Correspondence Detection , 2014 .

[14]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Femoral and tibial torsion measurements with 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs in comparison with standard CT measurements. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  M. Ochi,et al.  Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[16]  P. Kingsley,et al.  A study to determine the angle of anteversion of the neck of the femur. , 1948, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  L. Dias,et al.  CT determination of femoral torsion. , 1981, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Parsons Fg,et al.  The Characters of the English Thigh-Bone. , 1914 .

[19]  W. Barsoum,et al.  Relationship Between Proximal Femoral and Acetabular Alignment in Normal Hip Joints Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  Anthony Skalak,et al.  Proximal Femoral Anatomy in the Normal Human Population , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  M. Pring,et al.  MR evaluation of femoral neck version and tibial torsion , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[22]  D. Dunn Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. , 1952, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  S B Murphy,et al.  Femoral anteversion. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  Marc J Philippon,et al.  Relationship between femoral anteversion and findings in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[26]  J RIPPSTEIN,et al.  [Determination of the antetorsion of the femur neck by means of two x-ray pictures]. , 1955, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[27]  John D. Koerner,et al.  Impact of specialty and level of training on CT measurement of femoral version: an interobserver agreement analysis , 2013, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[28]  J. Argenson,et al.  Anatomy of the proximal femur at the time of total hip arthroplasty is a matter of morphotype and etiology but not gender , 2015, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[29]  M. Hartel,et al.  Restoration of hip architecture with bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the elderly: does it affect early functional outcome? , 2013, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.