The locus of knowledge effects in concept learning.

Three experiments investigated how knowledge influences concept formation and representation in a standard concept acquisition task. The primary comparison was among arbitrary concepts, which had meaningless features; meaningful concepts, which had meaningful features from different domains; and integrated concepts, which had meaningful features interconnected by common knowledge. Experiment 1 found that learning was superior for the integrated concepts but that there was little difference as a function of feature meaningfulness. Experiment 2 suggested that the integrated Ss were learning to form a knowledge-based schema as their concept representation because they did not distinguish the typicality of features that differed in frequency. Experiment 3 introduced a category whose features were from the same domain but were not otherwise related. This concept was as difficult to learn and use as the meaningful concepts were. These comparisons help specify the ways in which knowledge does and does not influence concept formation.

[1]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Susan Carey,et al.  Acquiring a Single New Word , 1978 .

[4]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Fact retrieval and the paradox of interference , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[8]  F. Keil.  Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development. , 1981 .

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  Linear separability in classification learning. , 1981 .

[10]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Cue validity and levels of categorization. , 1982 .

[11]  Mark W. Altom,et al.  Correlated symptoms and simulated medical classification. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  L. Reder,et al.  Integrated knowledge in different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects , 1983 .

[13]  J.A. Anderson,et al.  Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage. , 1984 .

[14]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[15]  S. Carey.  Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[16]  Douglas L Medin,et al.  Linear separability and concept learning: Context, relational properties, and concept naturalness , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  D. Medin,et al.  Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  R. Nosofsky.  Similarity, frequency, and category representations. , 1988 .

[20]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Feature correlations in conceptual representations , 1989 .

[21]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Rules and exemplars in categorization, identification, and recognition. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. , 1990 .

[23]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Harpoons and long sticks: the interaction of theory and similarity in rule induction , 1991 .

[24]  M. Pazzani.  Influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. , 1991 .

[25]  M. Pazzani,et al.  Concept formation knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning , 1991 .

[26]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis , 1993 .

[27]  G. Murphy.  A rational theory of concepts , 1993 .

[28]  Roman Taraban,et al.  Categorization by humans and machines , 1993 .

[29]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Theories and concept formation. , 1993 .