Excess May Do Harm: Investigating the Effect of Team External Environment on External Activities in Teams

We extend research on team external environment by investigating whether lack of permanence, fluid membership, and environmental volatility influence the relationship between team external activities and team effectiveness. Teams engage in external activities with clients, audiences, funding sources, or other stakeholders who may receive the work of the team and/or who convey access to legitimacy and resources, and who may be outside of any organization team members represent. We seek to understand whether significant external activities reach a point of diminishing returns, arguing that the utility of such activity depends on the team external environment. Our study consisted of a quantitative analysis of 140 film-making teams rated by the teams and 5,000 film viewers. We found that the relationship between team external activities and effectiveness is nonmonotonic; a moderate amount of activity is associated with the highest level of effectiveness, but these effects are contingent upon the aforementioned environmental characteristics. Our findings extend current theory on team external environment and external activities and have practical implications for collaborators in dynamic environments hoping to optimize their effectiveness without compromising their vision.

[1]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[2]  Yoav Ganzach,et al.  Misleading Interaction and Curvilinear Terms , 1997 .

[3]  Catherine E. Volpe,et al.  Defining Competencies and Establishing Team Training Requirements , 1995 .

[4]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Separating individual and group effects , 1985 .

[5]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  The disaggregation of corporations: Selective intervention, high powered incentives and molecular units , 1997 .

[6]  Simone Ferriani,et al.  Organizational Learning under Organizational Impermanence: Collaborative Ties in Film Project Firms , 2005 .

[7]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn Interruptive Events and Team Knowledge Acquisition , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  J. A. Marrone Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future , 2010 .

[9]  Jin Nam Choi External Activities and Team Effectiveness , 2002 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2009 .

[11]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  In common predicament : social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation , 1967 .

[13]  Jack K. Ito,et al.  Effects of Task Difficulty and Interunit Interdependence on Information Processing Systems , 1986 .

[14]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen Structuring Change: Familiarity and Formal Interventions in Problem-Solving Groups , 2001 .

[15]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[16]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[17]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External Functions in Groups , 2008 .

[18]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[19]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  The congruence of motives and incentives in a voluntary organization , 1992 .

[20]  Aydin Basarir,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects , 2009 .

[21]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  Distal and Local Group Learning: Performance Trade-offs and Tensions , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[23]  G. PITT-RIVERS Human Ecology , 1936, Nature.

[24]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[25]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[26]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[27]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[28]  S. Maitlis,et al.  Triggers And Enablers Of Sensegiving In Organizations , 2007 .

[29]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Team Effectiveness in Multinational Organizations , 2003 .

[30]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[31]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Communication Patterns, Project Performance and Task Characteristics: An Empirical Evaluation and Integration in An R&D Setting , 2017 .

[32]  D. Harrison,et al.  Beyond Relational Demography: Time and the Effects of Surface- and Deep-Level Diversity on Work Group Cohesion , 1998 .

[33]  K. Sutcliffe What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Management Teams , 1994 .

[34]  Richard W. Woodman,et al.  Humanizing organizational behavior: H. Meltzer and F.R. Wickert (Eds.) (Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1976) , 1977 .

[35]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[36]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[37]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Task Partitioning: An Innovation Process Variable , 2015 .

[38]  Deborah G. . Ancona Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[39]  Elazar J. Pedhazur,et al.  Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[40]  Frances J. Milliken Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment: State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty , 1987 .

[41]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  R. Katz The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. , 1982 .

[43]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Changing forms of organizing: dualities in using remote collaboration technologies in film production , 2001 .

[44]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[45]  J. Dawson,et al.  Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  X-Teams: How To Build Teams That Lead, Innovate, And Succeed , 2007 .

[48]  Beth A. Bechky Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[49]  Henry Moon ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY : DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS , 2004 .

[50]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[51]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Outward Bound: Strategies for Team Survival in the Organization , 2015 .

[52]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies , 2004 .

[54]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[55]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  Emergent Ideas from Emerging Markets: The Process of Discovery in Organizational Research , 2012 .

[56]  Anita L. Tucker,et al.  Implementing New Practices: An Empirical Study of Organizational Learning in Hospital Intensive Care Units , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[57]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[58]  Groups in Organizations: Extending Laboratory Models , 2011 .

[59]  M. Waller The Timing of Adaptive Group Responses to Nonroutine Events , 1999 .

[60]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Rebekah Dibble Collaboration for the common good: An examination of internal and external adjustment , 2010 .

[62]  Henrik Bresman,et al.  External Learning Activities and Team Performance: A Multimethod Field Study , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Stefaan Decoene,et al.  Measurement, design, and analysis - an integrated approach - pedhazur,ej, schmelkin,lp , 1995 .

[64]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[65]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Designing Work Within and Between Organizations , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[66]  Jason P. Davis,et al.  Complexity Theory , Market Dynamism , and the Strategy of Simple Rules , 2007 .

[67]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  The Comparative Advantage of X-Teams , 2002 .

[68]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[69]  J. Hale,et al.  Crisis Response Communication Challenges , 2005 .

[70]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Compose Teams to Assure Successful Boundary Activity , 2015 .

[71]  Christopher G. Gresov Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. , 1989 .

[72]  Lawrence S. Welch,et al.  Review and Conceptual Development , 2014 .

[73]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances , 2002 .

[74]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  When using knowledge can hurt performance: the value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company , 2005 .

[75]  Adler,et al.  Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system , 1999 .

[76]  R. Wageman Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[77]  L. Dyer,et al.  Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace And Organizational Agility With People , 2003 .

[78]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[79]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. , 1984 .

[80]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Architectural Innovation and Modular Corporate Forms , 2001 .

[81]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Transformational leadership: relations to the five-factor model and team performance in typical and maximum contexts. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  Myron M. Pisetsky GROUP RELATIONS READER , 1978 .

[83]  Stephen J. Carson,et al.  Uncertainty, Opportunism and Governance: The Effects of Volatility and Ambiguity on Formal and Relational Contracting , 2006 .