Acquiring Proper Nouns for Familiar and Unfamiliar Animate Objects: Two-Year-Olds' Word-learning Biases

In 2 studies, 2-year-old children learned a novel word modeled as a proper noun (e.g., “This is Zav”) for an animate stuffed toy. Children who learned the word for a familiar object (i.e., one for which they knew a basic-level count noun for the kind) interpreted the word appropriately as a proper noun reliably more often than children who learned the word for an unfamiliar object (i.e., one for which they did not know such a count noun). When the creature was familiar, children typically interpreted the novel word as if it were a proper noun referring uniquely to the labeled individual. When the animal was unfamiliar, children frequently interpreted the word as if it were a count noun referring to a kind of object. Children's spontaneous comments during the tasks provided striking additional evidence that their interpretations of the proper noun varied with the familiarity of the object. The results suggest that young children's sensitivity to the form class of proper nouns is affected by the familiarity of the referent object. The findings are discussed in terms of interpretative biases in word learning.

[1]  F. Moore Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[2]  S. Waxman,et al.  Nouns mark category relations: toddlers' and preschoolers' word-learning biases. , 1990, Child development.

[3]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Adjectives and Nouns: Children's Strategies for Learning New Words. , 1988 .

[4]  William E. Merriman,et al.  How Children Learn the Reference of Concrete Nouns: A Critique of Current Hypotheses , 1986 .

[5]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[6]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[7]  S. Gelman,et al.  How two-year-old children interpret proper and common names for unfamiliar objects. , 1984, Child development.

[8]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: Taxonomic versus thematic relations , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. , 1987 .

[10]  V. Gathercole,et al.  Contrast: a semantic constraint? , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Priorities in children's expectations about object label reference: form over color. , 1989, Child development.

[12]  E. Clark On the pragmatics of contrast , 1990, Journal of Child Language.

[13]  S. Gelman,et al.  Incorporating new words into the lexicon: preliminary evidence for language hierarchies in two-year-old children. , 1989, Child development.

[14]  E. Clark On the logic of contrast. , 1988, Journal of child language.

[15]  V. Gathercole,et al.  The contrastive hypothesis for the acquisition of word meaning: a reconsideration of the theory , 1987, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Preschoolers' use of superordinate relations in classification and language , 1986 .

[17]  T. Au,et al.  The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: to honor or not to honor? , 1990, Child development.

[18]  E. Markman,et al.  Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  WHAT'S IN A WORD? ON THE CHILD'S ACQUISITION OF SEMANTICS IN HIS FIRST LANGUAGE , 1973 .

[20]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[21]  L. Rescorla,et al.  Overextension in early language development , 1980, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  John Macnamara,et al.  What's in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. , 1974 .

[24]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Linguistic biases and the establishment of conceptual hierarchies: Evidence from preschool children , 1990 .