Modelling Amazonian forest eddy covariance data: a comparison of big leaf versus sun/shade models for the C-14 tower at Manaus I. Canopy photosynthesis

In this study, we concentrate on modelling gross primary productivity using two simple approaches to simulate canopy photosynthesis: "big leaf" and "sun/shade" models. Two approaches for calibration are used: scaling up of canopy photosynthetic parameters from the leaf to the canopy level and fitting canopy biochemistry to eddy covariance fluxes. Validation of the models is achieved by using eddy covariance data from the LBA site C14. Comparing the performance of both models we conclude that numerically (in terms of goodness of fit) and qualitatively, (in terms of residual response to different environmental variables) sun/shade does a better job. Compared to the sun/shade model, the big leaf model shows a lower goodness of fit and fails to respond to variations in the diffuse fraction, also having skewed responses to temperature and VPD. The separate treatment of sun and shade leaves in combination with the separation of the incoming light into direct beam and diffuse make sun/shade a strong modelling tool that catches more of the observed variability in canopy fluxes as measured by eddy covariance. In conclusion, the sun/shade approach is a relatively simple and effective tool for modelling photosynthetic carbon uptake that could be easily included in many terrestrial carbon models.

[1]  M. N. Ribeiro,et al.  Towards a water balance in the Central Amazonian region , 1987, Experientia.

[2]  Susan E. Trumbore,et al.  Respiration from a tropical forest ecosystem: partitioning of sources and low carbon use efficiency , 2004 .

[3]  Bart Kruijt,et al.  Variation of carbon and nitrogen cycling processes along a topographic gradient in a central Amazonian forest , 2004 .

[4]  D. Daly,et al.  Geographic distribution of tree species occurring in the region of Manaus, Brazil: implications for regional diversity and conservation , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[5]  G. Öquist,et al.  Mechanistic differences in photoinhibition of sun and shade plants , 1992, Planta.

[6]  Sander Houweling,et al.  CO 2 flux history 1982–2001 inferred from atmospheric data using a global inversion of atmospheric transport , 2003 .

[7]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  A Re-Evaluation of Long-Term Flux Measurement Techniques Part I: Averaging and Coordinate Rotation , 2003 .

[8]  D. Baldocchi.  Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[9]  Damian Barrett,et al.  Conversion of canopy intercepted radiation to photosynthate: review of modelling approaches for regional scales. , 2003, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[10]  W. Massman,et al.  Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges , 2002 .

[11]  W. Oechel,et al.  Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation , 2002 .

[12]  Marc Aubinet,et al.  Estimation of the carbon sequestration by a heterogeneous forest: night flux corrections, heterogeneity of the site and inter‐annual variability , 2002 .

[13]  Pavel Kabat,et al.  Comparative measurements of carbon dioxide fluxes from two nearby towers in a central Amazonian rainforest: the Manaus LBA site , 2002 .

[14]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Energy and water dynamics of a central Amazonian rain forest , 2002 .

[15]  T. Vesala,et al.  Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity , 2002 .

[16]  O. Atkin,et al.  Effect of temperature on rates of alternative and cytochrome pathway respiration and their relationship with the redox poise of the quinone pool. , 2002, Plant physiology.

[17]  Jeffrey Q. Chambers,et al.  Tree damage, allometric relationships, and above-ground net primary production in central Amazon forest , 2001 .

[18]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Productivity and carbon fluxes of tropical rain forests , 2001 .

[19]  J. Chambers,et al.  Respiration from coarse wood litter in central Amazon forests , 2001 .

[20]  P. Meir,et al.  Photographic method to measure the vertical distribution of leaf area density in forests , 2000 .

[21]  P. G. Jarvis,et al.  Photosynthetic capacity in a central Amazonian rain forest. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[22]  L. Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Direct and diffuse photosynthetically active radiation: measurements and modelling , 1999 .

[23]  Yadvinder Malhi,et al.  Carbon dioxide transfer over a Central Amazonian rain forest , 1998 .

[24]  H. Tian,et al.  Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems , 1998, Nature.

[25]  Phillips,et al.  Changes in the carbon balance of tropical forests: evidence from long-term plots , 1998, Science.

[26]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .

[27]  A. Verhoef,et al.  A system to measure surface fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, water vapour and carbon dioxide , 1997 .

[28]  P. Meir.  The exchange of carbon dioxide in tropical forest , 1996 .

[29]  Suan Chin Wong,et al.  A simple calibrated model of Amazon rainforest productivity based on leaf biochemical properties , 1995 .

[30]  J. Moncrieff,et al.  Fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over an undisturbed tropical forest in south‐west Amazonia , 1995 .

[31]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Sources and Sinks of Atmospheric CO2 , 1992 .

[32]  W. Beckman,et al.  Diffuse fraction correlations , 1990 .

[33]  R. Dickinson,et al.  Comments on ‘Modelling tropical deforestation: A study of GCM land-surface parametrizations’ by R. E. Dickinson and A. Henderson-Sellers (January B 1988, 114, 439–462) , 1989 .

[34]  D. Righi,et al.  Geochemical differences in an Oxisol-Spodosol toposequence of Amazonia, Brazil , 1989 .

[35]  C.J.T. Spitters,et al.  Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part II. Calculation of canopy photosynthesis , 1986 .

[36]  M. A. Fosberg,et al.  Modeling airborne transport of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: lymantriidae) larvae , 1986 .

[37]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  SEPARATING THE DIFFUSE AND DIRECT COMPONENT OF GLOBAL RADIATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELING CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS PART I. COMPONENTS OF INCOMING RADIATION , 1986 .

[38]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Partitioning solar radiation into direct and diffuse, visible and near-infrared components , 1985 .

[39]  M. Wesely,et al.  Variability of Short Term Eddy-Correlation Estimates of Mass Exchange , 1985 .

[40]  B. Hicks,et al.  The Forest-Atmosphere Interaction , 1985 .

[41]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions , 1982 .

[42]  J. Duffie,et al.  Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation , 1982 .

[43]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. , 1977, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[44]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  Crop Micrometeorology: A Simulation Study , 1977 .

[45]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..