Towards an Optimal Account of Second Position Phenomena

One of the early classics in generative grammar, published in the same year as Chomsky’s Syntactic Structures, was a paper by Morris Halle (1957) “In Defense of the Number Two.” The present paper might be seen as a further attempt to substantiate the linguistic significance of “two,” this time in the ordinal sense of “second” rather than that of binarity. A variety of recent analyses have attempted to claim, in effect, that the appearance of a notion of ‘second position’ in the descriptive statement of several natural language regularities is actually an artifact, that the real generalizations in each case refer to something else, and that the connection with second position is coincidental. I will argue, in contrast, that a number of effects are indeed related in a fundamental and unitary way to the notion of second position. The most appropriate way to capture these regularities appears to be in terms of a system of interacting constraints of the type envisioned in Optimality Theory, referring to the organization of a “postSpell Out” level of syntactic structure such as PF. In the syntactic literature of the past hundred years and more, there are two principal places where the notion of ‘second position’ seems to figure. Although the phenomena in question are at least superficially rather heterogeneous, one’s curiosity is naturally aroused as to whether there might

[1]  G. Legendre Optimal Romanian Clitics: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 2000, Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax.

[2]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  Morphological and Prosodic Alignment of Bulgarian Clitics , 2002 .

[3]  E. Williams Thematic structure in syntax , 1994 .

[4]  Sean E. Anderson Kwakwala Syntax and the Government-Binding Theory , 1984 .

[5]  Judith L. Klavans THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYNTAX AND PHONOLOGY IN CLITICIZATION , 1985 .

[6]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[7]  Peter Sells,et al.  Stylistic Fronting in Icelandic , 2003 .

[8]  J. Maling Inversion in embedded clauses in Modern Icelandic , 1990 .

[9]  Ž. Bošković Participle movement and second position cliticization in Serbo-Croatian , 1995 .

[10]  J. Zwart The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[11]  Jane Simpson Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach , 1991 .

[12]  G. Josefsson The true nature of Holmberg's generalization revisited : Once again , 2001 .

[13]  Chris Wilder,et al.  English finite auxiliaries in syntax and phonology , 1997 .

[14]  S. Anderson,et al.  How to put your Clitics in their Place or Why the Best Account of Second � Position Phenomena May be a Nearly Optimal One , 1996 .

[15]  Habibullah Tegey,et al.  The grammar of clitics : evidence from Pashto and other languages , 1977 .

[16]  J. Wackernagel,et al.  Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. , 1892 .

[17]  Taylor Roberts,et al.  The optimal second position in Pashto , 1997 .

[18]  T. Eythórsson Functional Categories, Cliticization, and Verb Movement in the Early Germanic Languages , 1996 .

[19]  David M. Perlmutter Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax , 1973 .

[20]  Marina Nespor,et al.  The Phonology of clitic groups , 1994 .

[21]  S. Anderson Wackernagel's Revenge: Clitics, Morphology, and the Syntax of Second Position , 1993 .

[22]  A. Holmberg Scandinavian stylistic fronting : Movement of phonological features in the syntax , 1997 .

[23]  Andrew Garrett,et al.  The syntax of Anatolian pronominal clitics , 1990 .

[24]  STEPHEN R. ANDERSON How to put your clitics in their place, or why the best account of second-position phenomena may be something like the optimal one , 1996 .

[25]  Aaron L. Halpern,et al.  Approaching second : second position clitics and related phenomena , 1996 .