Estimation of Staphylococcus aureus Growth Parameters from Turbidity Data: Characterization of Strain Variation and Comparison of Methods

ABSTRACT Turbidity methods offer possibilities for generating data required for addressing microorganism variability in risk modeling given that the results of these methods correspond to those of viable count methods. The objectives of this study were to identify the best approach for determining growth parameters based on turbidity data and use of a Bioscreen instrument and to characterize variability in growth parameters of 34 Staphylococcus aureus strains of different biotypes isolated from broiler carcasses. Growth parameters were estimated by fitting primary growth models to turbidity growth curves or to detection times of serially diluted cultures either directly or by using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) approach. The maximum specific growth rates in chicken broth at 17°C estimated by time to detection methods were in good agreement with viable count estimates, whereas growth models (exponential and Richards) underestimated growth rates. Time to detection methods were selected for strain characterization. The variation of growth parameters among strains was best described by either the logistic or lognormal distribution, but definitive conclusions require a larger data set. The distribution of the physiological state parameter ranged from 0.01 to 0.92 and was not significantly different from a normal distribution. Strain variability was important, and the coefficient of variation of growth parameters was up to six times larger among strains than within strains. It is suggested to apply a time to detection (ANOVA) approach using turbidity measurements for convenient and accurate estimation of growth parameters. The results emphasize the need to consider implications of strain variability for predictive modeling and risk assessment.

[1]  Fehlhaber,et al.  The study of Salmonellaenteritidis growth kinetics using Rapid Automated Bacterial Impedance Technique , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[2]  L. Devriese A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animal species. , 1984, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[3]  E. Dengremont,et al.  Statistical approach for comparison of the growth rates of five strains of Staphylococcus aureus , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  P. Sarradin,et al.  Heterogeneity of cell-associated CP5 expression on Staphylococcus aureus strains demonstrated by flow cytometry , 1997, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[5]  Thomas Ross,et al.  Modeling Microbial Growth Within Food Safety Risk Assessments , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  M Al-Rubeai,et al.  Growth and enumeration of the meat spoilage bacterium Brochothrix thermosphacta. , 1999, International journal of food microbiology.

[7]  K. Koutsoumanis,et al.  Comparison of maximum specific growth rates and lag times estimated from absorbance and viable count data by different mathematical models. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[8]  P. VARIATION OF LAG TIME AND SPECIFIC GROWTH RATE AMONG 11 STRAINS OF SALMONELLA INOCULATED ONTO STERILE GROUND CHICKEN BREAST BURGERS AND INCUBATED AT 25 C ' , 2006 .

[9]  L. Slade,et al.  Modeling the growth boundary of Staphylococcus aureus for risk assessment purposes. , 2001, Journal of food protection.

[10]  M. Delignette-Muller,et al.  Modeling the Lag Time of Listeria monocytogenes from Viable Count Enumeration and Optical Density Data , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  A M Lammerding,et al.  Hazard identification and exposure assessment for microbial food safety risk assessment. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[12]  Katherine O'Riordan,et al.  Staphylococcus aureus Capsular Polysaccharides , 2004, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[13]  G. Le Roux,et al.  Predictive microbiology and food safety. , 2000, International journal of food microbiology.

[14]  J. Augustin,et al.  Estimation of temperature dependent growth rate and lag time of Listeria monocytogenes by optical density measurements. , 1999, Journal of microbiological methods.

[15]  M. Delignette-Muller,et al.  Modelling the effect of a temperature shift on the lag phase duration of Listeria monocytogenes. , 2005, International journal of food microbiology.

[16]  A. Lebert,et al.  Variability of the response of 66Listeria monocytogenesandListeria innocuastrains to different growth conditions , 1997 .

[17]  P. Gerhardt,et al.  Methods for general and molecular bacteriology , 1994 .

[18]  G. R. Schmidt,et al.  Growth Variation Among Species and Strains of Listeria in Culture Broth. , 1994, Journal of food protection.

[19]  D. Vose,et al.  The application of quantitative risk assessment to microbial food safety. , 1998, Journal of food protection.

[20]  R. C. Whiting,et al.  Variation among Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains relative to their growth, survival, thermal inactivation, and toxin production in broth. , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[21]  T. Oscar Variation of lag time and specific growth rate among 11 strains of Salmonella inoculated onto sterile ground chicken breast burgers and incubated at 25C , 2000 .

[22]  K. Miller,et al.  Humectant permeability influences growth and compatible solute uptake by Staphylococcus aureus subjected to osmotic stress. , 2002, Journal of food protection.

[23]  R. C. Whiting,et al.  Thermal inactivation, growth, and survival studies of Listeria monocytogenes strains belonging to three distinct genotypic lineages. , 2003, Journal of food protection.

[24]  J Baranyi,et al.  Mathematics of predictive food microbiology. , 1995, International journal of food microbiology.

[25]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species , 1975, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[26]  A. Standaert,et al.  Environmental factors influencing the relationship between optical density and cell count for Listeria monocytogenes , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[27]  Quinn McNemar,et al.  On Growth Measurement , 1958 .

[28]  L. Devriese A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different animal species , 1984 .

[29]  B. Poutrel,et al.  Effects of culture conditions on production of type 5 capsular polysaccharide by human and bovine Staphylococcus aureus strains , 1995, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology.

[30]  D. Vose Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide , 2000 .

[31]  J. Smelt,et al.  Time to turbidity measurement as a tool for modeling spoilage byLactobacillus , 1993, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[32]  Maarten J Nauta,et al.  Modelling bacterial growth in quantitative microbiological risk assessment: is it possible? , 2002, International journal of food microbiology.

[33]  R. Buchanan,et al.  RESPONSE SURFACE MODELS FOR THE EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE, pH, SODIUM CHLORIDE, AND SODIUM NITRITE ON THE AEROBIC AND ANAEROBIC GROWTH OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS 196E , 1993 .

[34]  G. Z. Cosano,et al.  Assessment of mathematical models for predicting Staphylococcus aureus growth in cooked meat products. , 2002, Journal of food protection.

[35]  C. Pin,et al.  Estimating Bacterial Growth Parameters by Means of Detection Times , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.