The macroinvertebrate seedbank promotes community persistence in temporary rivers across climate zones

1. Aquatic macroinvertebrates inhabiting temporary rivers are typically described as having low resistance to riverbed drying. However, little research has examined the ‘seedbank’ within dry riverbed sediments, which comprises aquatic life stages that survive in dewatered sediments and from which active organisms may develop only after surface water returns. 2. We synthesised published and unpublished data from studies that had experimentally rehydrated sediments collected from dry riverbeds, to establish the importance of the seedbank in promoting macroinvertebrate community resistance. Studies from across climate zones were included, to examine seedbank importance in relation to environmental harshness and, in particular, sediment moisture. We also assessed the importance of the seedbank relative to alternative habitats promoting persistence of the flowing river (FR) assemblage. We predicted that the proportion of the FR assemblage present in rehydrated sediments (RS) would decrease with environmental harshness, due to conditions within the sediments becoming less conducive to the survival of biota. 3. A negative relationship between the proportion of FR taxa present in RS and harshness was observed, and this contributed to a reduction in the compositional similarity of FR and RS assemblages as harshness increased. Significant positive correlations were identified between sediment moisture content and macroinvertebrate community metrics (density and taxon richness) in some systems. 4. Habitats external to the dry reach, which contribute to community resilience, were invariably inhabited by a greater number of FR taxa than rehydrated sediments. However, rehydrated sediments included several FR taxa that were not found in any other habitats during the dry phase, including families of Coleoptera and Diptera. 5. Our results indicate the importance of the seedbank as a resistance mechanism for temporary river macroinvertebrates. With climate change scenarios predicting an increase in riverbed drying, maintaining habitats that facilitate the persistence of instream communities during dry phases is an increasing priority. We identified strong relationships between sediment moisture and taxon richness, and river management and rehabilitation activities should therefore aim to retain moisture in drying sediments, by manipulating parameters such as riparian shading.

[1]  W. Dodds,et al.  Harshness: characterisation of intermittent stream habitat over space and time , 2005 .

[2]  D. Batzer,et al.  Invertebrates that aestivate in dry basins of Carolina bay wetlands , 2002, Wetlands.

[3]  C. Heckrotte,et al.  Destruction and Re-establishment of Stream Fish and Invertebrates Affected by Drought , 1959 .

[4]  A. Benke,et al.  Invertebrate responses to decreasing water levels in a subtropical river floodplain wetland , 2005, Wetlands.

[5]  C. Humphrey,et al.  Macroinvertebrate recolonization after re-wetting of a tropical seasonally-flowing stream (Magela Creek, Northern Territory, Australia) , 1997 .

[6]  C. Townsend,et al.  Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems , 1994 .

[7]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Emerging concepts in temporary‐river ecology , 2010 .

[8]  Bryan P. Tronstad,et al.  Invertebrate seedbanks: rehydration of soil from an unregulated river floodplain in the south‐eastern U.S. , 2005 .

[9]  B. Robson,et al.  Drought refuges, spatial scale and recolonisation by invertebrates in non‐perennial streams , 2011 .

[10]  D. Arscott,et al.  Aquatic invertebrate community structure along an intermittence gradient: Selwyn River, New Zealand , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  T. Sommer,et al.  Just add water: sources of chironomid drift in a large river floodplain , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  D. Lytle,et al.  Adaptation to natural flow regimes. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  R. Norris,et al.  Is the hyporheic zone a refuge for macroinvertebrates in drying perennial streams , 2011 .

[14]  D. Williams.  The biology of temporary waters. , 2005 .

[15]  S. Larned,et al.  Responses of hyporheic invertebrate assemblages to large-scale variation in flow permanence and surface–subsurface exchange , 2007 .

[16]  M. R. V. Gutiérrez,et al.  Biological traits of stream macroinvertebrates from a semi-arid catchment: patterns along complex environmental gradients , 2007 .

[17]  T. Datry,et al.  Invertebrates and sestonic matter in an advancing wetted front travelling down a dry river bed (Albarine, France) , 2012, Freshwater Science.

[18]  V. Resh,et al.  Streams in Mediterranean Climate Regions: Abiotic Influences and Biotic Responses to Predictable Seasonal Events , 1999 .

[19]  S. Bunn,et al.  When the river runs dry: human and ecological values of dry riverbeds , 2012 .

[20]  P. S. Lake.  Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters , 2003 .

[21]  D. Lytle,et al.  Seasonal flow variation allows 'time-sharing' by disparate aquatic insect communities in montane desert streams , 2007 .

[22]  K. Fritz,et al.  Invertebrate colonization of leaves and roots within sediments of intermittent Coastal Plain streams across hydrologic phases , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[23]  J. Dennehy,et al.  GERM BANKING: BET‐HEDGING AND VARIABLE RELEASE FROM EGG AND SEED DORMANCY , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[24]  B. Robson,et al.  Aestivation provides flexible mechanisms for survival of stream drying in a larval trichopteran (Leptoceridae) , 2012 .

[25]  Ken M. Fritz,et al.  Resistance and Resilience of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages to Drying and Flood in a Tallgrass Prairie Stream System , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[26]  E. Stanley,et al.  Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream , 1994 .

[27]  T. Datry.  Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate assemblages along a flow intermittence gradient: effects of duration of dry events , 2012 .

[28]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[29]  T. Bo,et al.  Deep Interstitial Habitat as a Refuge for Agabus paludosus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) During Summer Droughts , 2006 .

[30]  M. A. Churchel,et al.  Recovery of Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Communities from Drought in Georgia Piedmont Headwater Streams , 2006 .

[31]  R. Stubbington.  The hyporheic zone as an invertebrate refuge: a review of variability in space, time, taxa and behaviour , 2012 .

[32]  P. Döll,et al.  How is the impact of climate change on river flow regimes related to the impact on mean annual runoff? A global-scale analysis , 2012 .

[33]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Biogeochemical Hot Spots and Hot Moments at the Interface of Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems , 2003, Ecosystems.

[34]  D. Williams.  Environmental Constraints in Temporary Fresh Waters and Their Consequences for the Insect Fauna , 1996, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  T. Datry,et al.  Spatial and temporal aquatic–terrestrial transitions in the temporary Albarine River, France: responses of invertebrates to experimental rewetting , 2012 .

[36]  David A. Lytle,et al.  Severe drought drives novel community trajectories in desert stream pools , 2011 .

[37]  K. Tockner,et al.  Consumer-specific responses to riverine subsidy pulses in a riparian arthropod assemblage , 2006 .

[38]  Andrew J. H. Davey,et al.  Fish community responses to drying disturbances in an intermittent stream: a landscape perspective , 2007 .

[39]  M. Brock,et al.  Drought and aquatic community resilience: the role of eggs and seeds in sediments of temporary wetlands , 2003 .

[40]  B. W. Sweeney,et al.  Egg and Larval Development Times for 35 Species of Tropical Stream Insects from Costa Rica , 1995, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[41]  P. Wood,et al.  Benthic and hyporheic invertebrate community responses to seasonal flow recession in a groundwater‐dominated stream , 2011 .

[42]  E. Stanley,et al.  Ecosystem Expansion and Contraction in Streams Desert streams vary in both space and time and fluctuate dramatically in size , 1997 .

[43]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[44]  D. Towns.  TERRESTRIAL OVIPOSITION BY TWO SPECIES OF CADDISFLY IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA (TRICHOPTERA: LEPTOCERIDAE) , 1983 .

[45]  P. Armitage,et al.  The response of perennial and temporary headwater stream invertebrate communities to hydrological extremes , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[46]  D. Williams.  Temporary forest pools: can we see the water for the trees? , 2005, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[47]  M. Murakami,et al.  Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  P. Zwick.  Variable egg development of Dinocras spp. (Plecoptera, Perlidae) and the stonefly seed bank theory , 1996 .

[49]  E. Stanley,et al.  Hyporheic processes during flooding and drying in a Sonoran Desert stream. II: Faunal dynamics , 1995 .

[50]  F. Sabater,et al.  Drought and postdrought recovery cycles in an intermittent Mediterranean stream: structural and functional aspects , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[51]  P. Wood,et al.  Spatial variability in the hyporheic zone refugium of temporary streams , 2011, Aquatic Sciences.

[52]  D. Hughes.  Some Factors Affecting Drift and Upstream Movements of Gammarus Pulex , 1970 .

[53]  W. Ponder,et al.  Freshwater snails of the genera Fluvidona and Austropyrgus (Gastropoda, Hydrobiidae) from northern New South Wales and southern Queensland, Australia , 1999 .

[54]  H. Danks.  Insect dormancy: an ecological perspective. , 1987 .

[55]  A. Boulton.  OVER-SUMMERING REFUGES OF AQUATIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN TWO INTERMITTENT STREAMS IN CENTRAL VICTORIA AUSTRALIA , 1989 .

[56]  S. Lysne,et al.  Experimental Studies on Habitat Preference and Tolerances of Three Species of Snails from the Snake River of Southern Idaho , 2006 .

[57]  Effect of substratum drying on the survival and migrations of Ponto-Caspian and native gammarids (Crustacea: Amphipoda) , 2012, Hydrobiologia.

[58]  N. Grimm,et al.  Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to long‐term flow variability in a Sonoran Desert stream , 2010 .

[59]  Nancy B. Grimm,et al.  Stability of an Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community in a Multiyear Hydrologic Disturbance Regime , 1992 .

[60]  C. Austin,et al.  Why life history information matters: drought refuges and macroinvertebrate persistence in non-perennial streams subject to a drier climate , 2011 .

[61]  R. Chapman.  The Insects: Structure and Function , 1969 .

[62]  R. Kenk.  The animal life of temporary and permanent ponds in southern Michigan , 1949 .

[63]  J. Velasco,et al.  Feeding Habits of Two Large Insects from a Desert Stream: Abedus herberti (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) and Thermonectus marmoratus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) , 1998 .

[64]  T. Oki,et al.  The implications of projected climate change for freshwater resources and their management , 2008 .

[65]  B. Richter,et al.  Droughts, floods and freshwater ecosystems: evaluating climate change impacts and developing adaptation strategies , 2011 .

[66]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Low river flow alters the biomass and population structure of a riparian predatory invertebrate , 2010 .

[67]  Stephen Tooth,et al.  Distinctiveness and Diversity of Arid Zone River Systems , 2011 .

[68]  L. Hultin.  Upstream movements of Gammarus pulex pulex (Amphipoda) in a South Swedish stream , 1971 .

[69]  A. Boulton,et al.  Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the river murray, Australia , 1992 .

[70]  D. Barnard,et al.  Factor from swamp water induces hatching in eggs of Anopheles diluvialis (Diptera : Culicidae) mosquitoes , 1999 .

[71]  S. Larned,et al.  Invertebrate and microbial responses to inundation in an ephemeral river reach in New Zealand: effects of preceding dry periods , 2007, Aquatic Sciences.