Sustainable use of renewable resources in a stylized social–ecological network model under heterogeneous resource distribution

Abstract. Human societies depend on the resources ecosystems provide. Particularly since the last century, human activities have transformed the relationship between nature and society at a global scale. We study this coevolutionary relationship by utilizing a stylized model of private resource use and social learning on an adaptive network. The latter process is based on two social key dynamics beyond economic paradigms: boundedly rational imitation of resource use strategies and homophily in the formation of social network ties. The private and logistically growing resources are harvested with either a sustainable (small) or non-sustainable (large) effort. We show that these social processes can have a profound influence on the environmental state, such as determining whether the private renewable resources collapse from overuse or not. Additionally, we demonstrate that heterogeneously distributed regional resource capacities shift the critical social parameters where this resource extraction system collapses. We make these points to argue that, in more advanced coevolutionary models of the planetary social–ecological system, such socio-cultural phenomena as well as regional resource heterogeneities should receive attention in addition to the processes represented in established Earth system and integrated assessment models.

[1]  Ö. Bodin,et al.  Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems , 2012 .

[2]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Hartmut Rosa,et al.  Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity , 2013 .

[5]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  A comprehensive view on climate change: coupling of earth system and integrated assessment models , 2012 .

[6]  E. Hess Origins of Behavior , 1966 .

[7]  S. Kaveri,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth System , 2010 .

[8]  S. Levin,et al.  Regime shifts in a social-ecological system , 2013, Theoretical Ecology.

[9]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Modelling social-ecological transformations: an adaptive network proposal , 2017, 1704.06135.

[10]  W. Steffen,et al.  Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure , 2005 .

[11]  John M. Anderies,et al.  Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social-ecological systems , 2006 .

[12]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  ‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Choy Heng Lai,et al.  Socioecological regime shifts in the setting of complex social interactions. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Human strategy updating in evolutionary games , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  T. Malthus An essay on the principle of population : or, A view of its past and present effects on human happiness; with an inquiry into our prospects respecting the future removal or mitigation of the evils which it occasions. , 1996 .

[16]  Kate Raworth,et al.  A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? , 2012 .

[17]  M J Keeling,et al.  Multiplicative moments and measures of persistence in ecology. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  T. Malthus An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society , 2006 .

[19]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[20]  B. Bollobás The evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[21]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Horses for courses : analytical tools to explore planetary boundaries , 2015 .

[22]  Maja Schlüter,et al.  The Survival of the Conformist: Social Pressure and Renewable Resource Management , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Timothy Clark,et al.  Social tipping points and Earth systems dynamics , 2014, Front. Environ. Sci..

[24]  P. Crutzen Geology of mankind , 2002, Nature.

[25]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[26]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion? , 2014 .

[27]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[28]  T. Bernauer,et al.  The green side of protectionism: Environmental concerns and three facets of trade policy preferences , 2010 .

[29]  W. Steffen,et al.  The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration , 2015 .

[30]  P. Erdos,et al.  On the evolution of random graphs , 1984 .

[31]  D. Meadows,et al.  The Limits to Growth , 2018, Green Planet Blues.

[32]  H. J. Schellnhuber,et al.  Discourse: Earth System Analysis — The Scope of the Challenge , 1998 .

[33]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[34]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Clustered marginalization of minorities during social transitions induced by co-evolution of behaviour and network structure , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Macroscopic description of complex adaptive networks coevolving with dynamic node states. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  J. Brander,et al.  The Simple Economics of Easter Island: A Ricardo-Malthus Model of Renewable Resource Use , 1998 .

[37]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene , 2016 .

[38]  E. Schöll,et al.  Erratum: The Dynamics of Coalition Formation on Complex Networks , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[39]  M. Common,et al.  Natural resource and environmental economics , 1996 .

[40]  G Hardin,et al.  The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. , 1968, Science.

[41]  Chun Wong,et al.  Modeling complex systems with adaptive networks , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[42]  Frank Lunkeit,et al.  Earth system models of intermediate complexity: closing the gap in the spectrum of climate system models , 2002 .

[43]  C. Lai,et al.  Influence of network structure on cooperative dynamics in coupled socio-ecological systems , 2013 .

[44]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Governance Synapses in the Network: Learning in Governance Networks in the Context of Environmental Management , 2010 .

[45]  P. Crutzen,et al.  The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature , 2007, Ambio.

[46]  W. Lam Governing the Commons , 2010 .

[47]  C. Folke,et al.  Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience , 1998 .

[48]  Jonathan F. Donges,et al.  Co-evolutionary behaviour selection in adaptive social networks predicts clustered marginalization of minorities , 2015, ArXiv.

[49]  Damián H. Zanette,et al.  Opinion spreading and agent segregation on evolving networks , 2006 .

[50]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[51]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.