Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre‐ and post‐test probabilities and their use in clinical practice

The sensitivity and specificity of a test cannot be used to estimate probability of disease in individual patients. They can, however, be combined into a single measure called the likelihood ratio which is, clinically, more useful than sensitivity or specificity. Likelihood ratios provide a summary of how many times more (or less) likely patients with a disease are to have a particular result than patients without the disease. Using the principles of the Bayes theorem, likelihood ratios can be used in conjunction with pre‐test probability of disease to estimate an individual's post‐test probability of disease, that is his or her chance of having disease once the result of a test is known. The Fagan's nomogram is a graphical tool which, in routine clinical practice, allows one to combine the likelihood ratio of a test with a patient's pre‐test probability of disease to estimate post‐test probability.

[1]  Fagan Tj Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. , 1975 .

[2]  S. Guandalini,et al.  Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease , 1990 .

[3]  J. Walker-Smith Management of infantile gastroenteritis. , 1990, Archives of disease in childhood.

[4]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[5]  Purushottam W. Laud,et al.  Diagnostic Tests , 2019, Bayesian Thinking in Biostatistics.

[6]  Tom Lang,et al.  How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers , 1997 .

[7]  T. Lang,et al.  How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors , 1997 .

[8]  A. Halkin,et al.  Likelihood ratios: getting diagnostic testing into perspective. , 1998, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[9]  G. Holmes Coeliac disease and Type 1 diabetes mellitus – the case for screening , 2001, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[10]  Decisions on diagnosis in family practice: Use of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios , 2003 .

[11]  John Attia,et al.  Moving beyond sensitivity and specificity: using likelihood ratios to help interpret diagnostic tests , 2003 .

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: a systematic review. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[14]  E. Aktas,et al.  Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Turkish Children , 2005, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[15]  C. Schmid,et al.  Why clinicians are natural bayesians , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  A. Akobeng Understanding diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity, specificity and predictive values , 2007, Acta paediatrica.