- {ㄹ/을} - 를 수반하는 종결어미들의 어휘적 속성
暂无分享,去创建一个
In this paper, I examine some sentence-ending markers (= Xs) accompanied with the morpheme -(u)l- ("will") that is ambiguous between non-epistemic will (will¹) and epistemic will (will²): -(u)l-lay, -(u)l-kka, -(u)l-kel, etc. Based on empirical data, I try to show that they have the following lexical properties/informations: (a) the person feature information of the subject they allow (b) the speech act information they trigger, (c) their selectional property in relation to whether they select will¹ or will², and (d) their lexical property in relation to whether they trigger the opposite polarity readings, which I call nPOS/nNEG (=nominal positive/negative) readings following Choe (2015). During the discussion, I suggest the following two descriptive generalizations: (I) will², but not will¹, can come with the tense morpheme -(e)ss-, and (II) Xs that come with will² allow any person (1 st , 2 nd , or 3 rd person) subject while Xs that come with will¹ may not (probably for lexical/semantic reasons). I also provide evidence in favor of the following generalizations suggested in Choe (2015): (A) Declarative Xs as well as interrogative Xs can trigger nPOS/nNEG readings, and (B) an X with the feature [Speaker"s Denial] triggers nPOS/nNEG readings when it is in the same clause as POS/NEG.