Comparison of cementing techniques of the tibial component in total knee replacement

[1]  T. Seyler,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty using cementless keels and cemented tibial trays: 10-year results , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[2]  Martin Sundberg,et al.  Radiostereometric analysis of the double-coated STAR total ankle prosthesis , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[3]  A. Björkman,et al.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[4]  L. Weidenhielm,et al.  All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty—a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: Part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[5]  L. Weidenhielm,et al.  All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty—a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: Part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[6]  W. Plitz,et al.  Micromotion in cemented rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: cemented tibial stem versus hybrid fixation , 2005, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[7]  K. Bachus,et al.  Tibial Component Fixation With Cement: Full- Versus Surface-Cementation Techniques , 2003, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[8]  B. Bai,et al.  The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  J. Bert,et al.  Is It Necessary to Cement the Tibial Stem in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  S. Shott,et al.  Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. A randomised RSA study in 116 patients. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  P. Herberts,et al.  Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised study. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  D L Bartel,et al.  Consequences of an interference fit on the fixation of porous-coated tibial components in total knee replacement. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  F. C. Ewald.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  R. Bourne,et al.  The Influence of Tibial Component Intramedullary Stems and Implant‐Cortex Contact on the Strain Distribution of the Proximal Tibia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Study , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  T. Olsson,et al.  Technical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.