A critical assessment of finite element modeling approach for protein dynamics

Finite element (FE) modeling approach has emerged as an efficient way of calculating the dynamic properties of supramolecular protein structures and their complexes. Its efficiency mainly stems from the fact that the complexity of three-dimensional shape of a molecular surface dominates the computational cost rather than the molecular size or the number of atoms. However, no critical evaluation of the method has been made yet particularly for its sensitivity to the parameters used in model construction. Here, we make a close investigation on the effect of FE model parameters by analyzing 135 representative protein structures whose normal modes calculated using all-atom normal mode analysis are publicly accessible online. Results demonstrate that it is more beneficial to use a contour surface of electron densities as the molecular surface, in general, rather than to employ a solvent excluded surface, and that the solution accuracy is almost insensitive to the model parameters unless we avoid extreme values leading to an inaccurate depiction of the characteristic shapes.

[1]  Mark Bathe,et al.  Conformational dynamics data bank: a database for conformational dynamics of proteins and supramolecular protein assemblies , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  Hyuntae Na,et al.  Conventional NMA as a better standard for evaluating elastic network models , 2015, Proteins.

[3]  Michael Garland,et al.  Surface simplification using quadric error metrics , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[4]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Finite element Euler computations in three dimensions , 1988 .

[5]  Mark Bathe,et al.  Conformational dynamics of supramolecular protein assemblies. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  N. Go,et al.  Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[10]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Yuhong Wang,et al.  Heterogeneity of single molecule FRET signals reveals multiple active ribosome subpopulations , 2014, Proteins.

[12]  M. Bathe A finite element framework for computation of protein normal modes and mechanical response , 2007, Proteins.

[13]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  William S Klug,et al.  Nonlinear finite-element analysis of nanoindentation of viral capsids. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  N. Go,et al.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding, and fluctuations by computer simulation. II. A. Three‐dimensional lattice model of lysozyme , 1978 .

[16]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data , 1998, Proteins.

[17]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[18]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[19]  A. Garcia,et al.  Simulations of CRP:(cAMP)2 in noncrystalline environments show a subunit transition from the open to the closed conformation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[20]  D. F. Watson Computing the n-Dimensional Delaunay Tesselation with Application to Voronoi Polytopes , 1981, Comput. J..

[21]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[22]  Mario Markus,et al.  Multipeaked probability distributions of recurrence times. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  E W Knapp,et al.  mFES: A Robust Molecular Finite Element Solver for Electrostatic Energy Computations. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  G. Chirikjian,et al.  Efficient generation of feasible pathways for protein conformational transitions. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Hyuntae Na,et al.  Bridging between normal mode analysis and elastic network models , 2014, Proteins.

[26]  I. Bahar,et al.  Normal mode analysis : theory and applications to biological and chemical systems , 2005 .

[27]  Paresh Parikh,et al.  Generation of three-dimensional unstructured grids by the advancing-front method , 1988 .

[28]  Mark Bathe,et al.  The subspace iteration method in protein normal mode analysis , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[29]  Min Hyeok Kim,et al.  Review: Elastic Network Model for Protein Structural Dynamics , 2014 .

[30]  D. Shenton,et al.  Three-Dimensional finite element mesh generation using delaunay tesselation , 1985 .

[31]  Hyuntae Na,et al.  The performance of fine‐grained and coarse‐grained elastic network models and its dependence on various factors , 2015, Proteins.

[32]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[33]  Valentina Tozzini,et al.  Coarse-grained models for proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  F. Tama,et al.  Normal mode based flexible fitting of high-resolution structure into low-resolution experimental data from cryo-EM. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[35]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[36]  Adam W Van Wynsberghe,et al.  Protein structural variation in computational models and crystallographic data. , 2006, Structure.

[37]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  Toward Modular Analysis of Supramolecular Protein Assemblies. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[38]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[39]  Michael Levitt,et al.  The normal modes of a protein: Native bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 2009 .

[40]  Igor Polikarpov,et al.  Average protein density is a molecular‐weight‐dependent function , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.