What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors' help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems.

Much of what is known about rape survivors' experiences with the legal and medical systems has come from victims' accounts; rarely have researchers collected "the other side of the story" to find out what system personnel say did or did not happen in these interactions. In the current study, rape survivors who sought emergency medical care were interviewed before their hospital discharge about what services they received and how they were treated by social system personnel. Corresponding accounts were then collected from doctors, nurses, and police officers. There was significant interrater reliability between the survivors and legal and medical system personnel regarding what services were or were not provided ("service delivery") and if system personnel engaged in "secondary victimization" behaviors (i.e., statements/actions that could be distressing to victims). However, police officers and doctors significantly underestimated the impact they were having on survivors. Victims reported significantly more post-system-contact distress than service providers thought they were experiencing.

[1]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[2]  E. Frank,et al.  The Rape Victim , 1983 .

[3]  P. Y. Martin.  Gender, Accounts, and Rape Processing Work , 1997 .

[4]  Sharon M. Wasco,et al.  Preventing the “Second Rape” , 2001 .

[5]  Lisa Frohmann,et al.  Discrediting Victims' Allegations of Sexual Assault: Prosecutorial Accounts of Case Rejections , 1991 .

[6]  Nancy C. Gamble,et al.  The second rape : society's continued betrayal of the victim , 1991 .

[7]  R. Campbell.  The Community Response to Rape: Victims' Experiences with the Legal, Medical, and Mental Health Systems , 1998, American journal of community psychology.

[8]  Lisa Frohmann,et al.  Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decisionmaking. , 1997 .

[9]  D. Bishai,et al.  Measuring the quality of medical care for women who experience sexual assault with data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. , 2002, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  R. Campbell,et al.  Secondary Victimization of Rape Victims: Insights From Mental Health Professionals Who Treat Survivors of Violence , 1999, Violence and Victims.

[11]  Cassia Spohn,et al.  Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: Guarding the "gateway to justice" , 2001 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[13]  Sharon M. Wasco,et al.  Community services for rape survivors: enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma? , 1999, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  P. Frazier,et al.  Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives , 1996 .

[15]  G. Clum,et al.  Predictors of post-rape medical care in a national sample of women. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  G. W. Snedecor.  Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[17]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Vicarious Traumatization, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Burnout in Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Agency Staff , 1999, Violence and Victims.

[18]  Lisa Frohmann.  Constituting Power in Sexual Assault Cases: Prosecutorial Strategies for Victim Management , 1998 .

[19]  H. H. Filipas,et al.  Correlates of Formal and Informal Support Seeking in Sexual Assault Victims , 2001 .