EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

[1]  Mark Pelling,et al.  Size does matter: City scale and the asymmetries of climate change adaptation in three coastal towns , 2017 .

[2]  T. Knoll,et al.  Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. , 2015, European urology.

[3]  M. Laopaiboon,et al.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  N. Karakoyunlu,et al.  A Comparison of Antegrade Percutaneous and Laparoscopic Approaches in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones , 2014, BioMed research international.

[5]  A. Kural,et al.  Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. , 2014, European urology.

[6]  Shang-Jen Chang,et al.  Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary in patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy? , 2014, BJU international.

[7]  G. Preminger,et al.  Effect of supine vs prone position on outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in staghorn calculi: results from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society Study. , 2013, Urology.

[8]  N. Xu,et al.  Prone versus Modified Supine Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a Prospective Randomized Study , 2013, International journal of medical sciences.

[9]  B. Eisner,et al.  1542 IMPACT OF PERIOPERATIVE ANTICOAGULATION ON INCIDENCE OF BLEEDING COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY , 2013 .

[10]  O. Traxer,et al.  Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[11]  M. Monga,et al.  Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy for stone disease in obese patients: a systematic review of the literature , 2012, BJU international.

[12]  A. Papatsoris,et al.  The New Digital Flexible Ureteroscopes: ‘Size Does Matter’ – Increased Ureteric Access Sheath Use! , 2012, Urologia Internationalis.

[13]  Ying Sun,et al.  Postoperative infection rates in low risk patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without antibiotic prophylaxis: a matched case control study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Arthur D. Smith,et al.  Predictive factors for intraoperative balloon dilation in semirigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[15]  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg,et al.  Exit strategies following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a comparison of surgical outcomes in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) PCNL Global Study , 2012, World Journal of Urology.

[16]  M. Pearle,et al.  The CROES percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Monga,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. , 2012, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[18]  S. Vowler,et al.  Meta‐analysis showing the beneficial effect of α‐blockers on ureteric stent discomfort , 2011, BJU international.

[19]  T. Knoll,et al.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10–30 mm size , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[20]  T. Knoll,et al.  Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? , 2011, Urological Research.

[21]  M. Binbay,et al.  Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[22]  Liangren Liu,et al.  Tamsulosin as adjunctive treatment after shockwave lithotripsy in patients with upper urinary tract stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[23]  David S. Wang,et al.  Is a safety wire necessary during routine flexible ureteroscopy? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[24]  D. Tolley,et al.  Evaluation of outcome following lithotripsy , 2010, Current opinion in urology.

[25]  P. Alken,et al.  Two contemporary series of percutaneous tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[26]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model , 2009, BJU international.

[27]  A. Papatsoris,et al.  Inversion, Hydration and Diuresis during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Does It Improve the Stone-Free Rate for Lower Pole Stone Clearance? , 2009, Urologia Internationalis.

[28]  B. Matlaga,et al.  Ureteroscopy during pregnancy , 2009, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[29]  A. Mandal,et al.  Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy versus Ballistic Lithotripsy for Treatment of Ureteric Stones: A Prospective Comparative Study , 2009, Urologia Internationalis.

[30]  K. Ghani,et al.  Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction , 2009, European Radiology.

[31]  Levels of Evidence , 2008 .

[32]  H. Ekerbicer,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of relationships between main spatial lower pole calyceal anatomic factors on the success of shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with lower pole kidney stones. , 2008, Urology.

[33]  A. Trinchieri,et al.  Infections and urolithiasis: current clinical evidence in prophylaxis and antibiotic therapy. , 2008, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica.

[34]  E. Havranek,et al.  First digital flexible ureterorenoscope: initial experience. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[35]  A. C. Buck,et al.  2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, European urology.

[36]  Kemal Sarica,et al.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[37]  Lee Cheng Zhao,et al.  Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[38]  K. Seow,et al.  Comparative study of conservative and surgical management for symptomatic moderate and severe hydronephrosis in pregnancy: a prospective randomized study , 2007, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[39]  A. El-Assmy,et al.  A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. , 2007, European urology.

[40]  D. Neilson,et al.  Do anatomic factors pose a significant risk in the formation of lower pole stones? , 2007, Urology.

[41]  A. Skolarikos,et al.  Is there still a role for open surgery in the management of renal stones? , 2006, Current opinion in urology.

[42]  G. Preminger.  Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy , 2006, Urological Research.

[43]  J. Palmer,et al.  Passive dilation by ureteral stenting before ureteroscopy: eliminating the need for active dilation. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[44]  D. Albala,et al.  Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. , 2005, Urology.

[45]  D. Ghiculete,et al.  Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[46]  Ilia S. Zeltser,et al.  An update on ureteroscopic instrumentation for the treatment of urolithiasis , 2004, Current opinion in urology.

[47]  R. Clayman,et al.  Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[48]  L. Eichel,et al.  Operator experience and adequate anesthesia improve treatment outcome with third-generation lithotripters. , 2001, Journal of endourology.

[49]  C. Roy,et al.  Natural History of Residual Renal Stone Fragments after ESWL , 2000, European Urology.

[50]  S. Akkus,et al.  Effect of vibration massage therapy after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with lower caliceal stones. , 1999, Journal of endourology.

[51]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  Electrohydraulic versus pneumatic disintegration in the treatment of ureteral stones: a randomized, prospective trial. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[52]  M. Marberger,et al.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy retreatment ("stir-up") promotes discharge of persistent caliceal stone fragments after primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[53]  U. Nagele,et al.  Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. , 2012, European urology.

[54]  S. Singh,et al.  Tamsulosin as an Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Calculus after Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2011 .

[55]  S. Vowler,et al.  Meta-analysis showing the beneficial effect of alpha-blockers on ureteric stent discomfort , 2011 .

[56]  T. Cai,et al.  Guidelines on Urological Infections , 2009 .

[57]  B. Trock,et al.  The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[58]  A. A. K. Musa.  Use of double-J stents prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is not beneficial: results of a prospective randomized study , 2006, International Urology and Nephrology.

[59]  R. Riehle,et al.  The fate of residual fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of infection stones. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[60]  G. Nabi,et al.  Ureteroscopy: Systematic Review and Outcomes of Stenting after Uncomplicated Rapid Responses Research Outcomes of Stenting after Uncomplicated Ureteroscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2022 .