Homophily, Cultural Drift, and the Co-Evolution of Cultural Groups

Studies of cultural differentiation have shown that social mechanisms that normally lead to cultural convergence—homophily and influence—can also explain how distinct cultural groups can form. However, this emergent cultural diversity has proven to be unstable in the face of cultural drift—small errors or innovations that allow cultures to change from within. The authors develop a model of cultural differentiation that combines the traditional mechanisms of homophily and influence with a third mechanism of network homophily, in which network structure co-evolves with cultural interaction. Results show that in certain regions of the parameter space, these co-evolutionary dynamics can lead to patterns of cultural diversity that are stable in the presence of cultural drift. The authors address the implications of these findings for understanding the stability of cultural diversity in the face of increasing technological trends toward globalization.

[1]  Wei Zhao,et al.  The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies , 2007 .

[2]  Maxi San Miguel,et al.  Information Feedback and Mass Media Effects in Cultural Dynamics , 2007, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[3]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[4]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society , 2006 .

[5]  David B. Grusky,et al.  The Case for a New Class Map1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  Rick Durrett,et al.  Can stable social groups be maintained by homophilous imitation alone , 2005 .

[7]  M. Macy,et al.  The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self‐Enforcing Norms1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Cooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  P. Richerson,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Cultures , 2005 .

[10]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Globalization, polarization and cultural drift , 2005 .

[11]  P. M. Gleiser,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for the propagation of innovations among economic agents. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  Raúl Toral,et al.  Role of dimensionality in Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture , 2003 .

[13]  Noah Mark,et al.  Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[14]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[15]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  V. Eguíluz,et al.  Global culture: a noise-induced transition in finite systems. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  M. Macy Polarization in Dynamic Networks : A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure , 2003 .

[18]  J. Greig,et al.  The End of Geography? , 2002 .

[19]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[20]  David Lazer,et al.  The co‐evolution of individual and network , 2001 .

[21]  Yasufumi Shibanai,et al.  Effects of Global Information Feedback on Diversity , 2001 .

[22]  M. McPherson,et al.  BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .

[23]  M. Marsili,et al.  Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence , 2000, Physical review letters.

[24]  Bibb Latané,et al.  Pressures to uniformity and the evolution of cultural norms: Modeling dynamic social impact. , 2000 .

[25]  Noah Mark,et al.  Beyond individual differences : Social differentiation from first principles , 1998 .

[26]  J. Kennedy Thinking is Social , 1998 .

[27]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[28]  D. J. Elkins,et al.  Globalization, Telecommunication, and Virtual Ethnic Communities , 1997 .

[29]  D. Heckathorn The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action , 1996 .

[30]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[32]  M. Macy Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Robert J. Foster,et al.  Making National Cultures in The Global Ecumene , 1991 .

[34]  David Knoke,et al.  Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. , 1991 .

[35]  W. Shrum Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .

[36]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[37]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[38]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[39]  L. Verbrugge A Research Note on Adult Friendship Contact: A Dyadic Perspective , 1983 .

[40]  T. Huston,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and relationships. , 1978, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  L. Verbrugge The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[42]  Jere M. Cohen Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .

[43]  C. Fischer,et al.  Networks and places: social relations in the urban setting , 1977 .

[44]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[45]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Peer Influences on Aspirations: A Reinterpretation , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[48]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[49]  George C. Homans Sentiments and activities , 1962 .

[50]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[51]  mile .QDurkheim mile Durkheim,et al.  The Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 1916 .

[52]  E. Durkheim FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.