Homophily, Cultural Drift, and the Co-Evolution of Cultural Groups
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Wei Zhao,et al. The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies , 2007 .
[2] Maxi San Miguel,et al. Information Feedback and Mass Media Effects in Cultural Dynamics , 2007, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..
[3] Jon M. Kleinberg,et al. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.
[4] H. Blossfeld,et al. Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society , 2006 .
[5] David B. Grusky,et al. The Case for a New Class Map1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.
[6] Rick Durrett,et al. Can stable social groups be maintained by homophilous imitation alone , 2005 .
[7] M. Macy,et al. The Emperor’s Dilemma: A Computational Model of Self‐Enforcing Norms1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.
[8] V. Eguíluz,et al. Cooperation and the Emergence of Role Differentiation in the Dynamics of Social Networks1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.
[9] P. Richerson,et al. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures , 2005 .
[10] V. Eguíluz,et al. Globalization, polarization and cultural drift , 2005 .
[11] P. M. Gleiser,et al. Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for the propagation of innovations among economic agents. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[12] Raúl Toral,et al. Role of dimensionality in Axelrod's model for the dissemination of culture , 2003 .
[13] Noah Mark,et al. Culture and Competition: Homophily and distancing Explanations for Cultural Niches , 2003, American Sociological Review.
[14] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.
[15] V. Eguíluz,et al. Nonequilibrium transitions in complex networks: a model of social interaction. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[16] V. Eguíluz,et al. Global culture: a noise-induced transition in finite systems. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[17] M. Macy. Polarization in Dynamic Networks : A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure , 2003 .
[18] J. Greig,et al. The End of Geography? , 2002 .
[19] M. McPherson,et al. Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .
[20] David Lazer,et al. The co‐evolution of individual and network , 2001 .
[21] Yasufumi Shibanai,et al. Effects of Global Information Feedback on Diversity , 2001 .
[22] M. McPherson,et al. BIRDS OF A FEATHER: Homophily , 2001 .
[23] M. Marsili,et al. Nonequilibrium phase transition in a model for social influence , 2000, Physical review letters.
[24] Bibb Latané,et al. Pressures to uniformity and the evolution of cultural norms: Modeling dynamic social impact. , 2000 .
[25] Noah Mark,et al. Beyond individual differences : Social differentiation from first principles , 1998 .
[26] J. Kennedy. Thinking is Social , 1998 .
[27] R. Axelrod. The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .
[28] D. J. Elkins,et al. Globalization, Telecommunication, and Virtual Ethnic Communities , 1997 .
[29] D. Heckathorn. The dynamics and dilemmas of collective action , 1996 .
[30] J. M. McPherson,et al. On the Edge or In Between: Niche Position, Niche Overlap, and the Duration of Voluntary Association Memberships , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.
[31] J. M. McPherson,et al. Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .
[32] M. Macy. Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.
[33] Robert J. Foster,et al. Making National Cultures in The Global Ecumene , 1991 .
[34] David Knoke,et al. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. , 1991 .
[35] W. Shrum. Friendship in School: Gender and Racial Homophily. , 1988 .
[36] P. V. Marsden,et al. Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .
[37] L. Smith-Lovin,et al. Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .
[38] P. V. Marsden,et al. Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .
[39] L. Verbrugge. A Research Note on Adult Friendship Contact: A Dyadic Perspective , 1983 .
[40] T. Huston,et al. Interpersonal attraction and relationships. , 1978, Annual review of psychology.
[41] L. Verbrugge. The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .
[42] Jere M. Cohen. Sources of peer group homogeneity. , 1977 .
[43] C. Fischer,et al. Networks and places: social relations in the urban setting , 1977 .
[44] E. Rogers,et al. Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .
[45] Mark S. Granovetter. The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.
[46] O. D. Duncan,et al. Peer Influences on Aspirations: A Reinterpretation , 1968, American Journal of Sociology.
[47] P. Lazarsfeld,et al. Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .
[48] E. Rogers,et al. Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .
[49] George C. Homans. Sentiments and activities , 1962 .
[50] Morroe Berger,et al. Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .
[51] mile .QDurkheim mile Durkheim,et al. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life , 1916 .
[52] E. Durkheim. FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.