Effect of Spatial Proximity and Human Thermal Plume on the Design of a DIY Human-Centered Thermohygrometric Monitoring System

Wearable devices have been introduced for research purposes and especially for environmental monitoring, with the aim of collecting large amounts of data. In a previous study, we addressed the measurement reliability of low-cost thermohygrometers. In this study, we aim to find out how human thermal plume could affect the measurement performance of thermohygrometers. For this purpose, we used a Do-It-Yourself device that can be easily replicated. It consists of 10 iButtons with 3D-printed brackets to position them at different distances from the body. The device was attached to the user’s belt in a seated position. We considered two scenarios: a summer scenario with an air temperature of 28 °C and a clothing thermal resistance of 0.5 clo and an autumn scenario with an air temperature of 21 °C and a clothing thermal resistance of 1.0 clo. The results show that the proximity of the measurement station to the body significantly affects the accuracy of the measurements and should be considered when developing new wearable devices to assess thermal comfort. Therefore, we recommend that at least two thermohygrometers be considered in the development of a new wearable device if it is to be worn on a belt, with one positioned as close to the body as possible and the other at least 8 cm away, to determine if and how the standard thermal comfort assessment differs from the user’s personal perception and whether spatial proximity might also play a role.

[1]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Personal comfort models based on a 6‐month experiment using environmental parameters and data from wearables , 2022, Indoor air.

[2]  Jason Lee,et al.  Transformational IoT sensing for air pollution and thermal exposures , 2022, Frontiers in Built Environment.

[3]  C. Becchio,et al.  Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations , 2022, Building and Environment.

[4]  C. Berger,et al.  Bridging the gap from test rooms to field-tests for human indoor comfort studies: A critical review of the sustainability potential of living laboratories , 2022, Energy Research & Social Science.

[5]  F. Maréchal,et al.  Reinforcement Learning for proactive operation of residential energy systems by learning stochastic occupant behavior and fluctuating solar energy: Balancing comfort, hygiene and energy use , 2022, Applied Energy.

[6]  S. Sibilio,et al.  Low-Cost Thermohygrometers to Assess Thermal Comfort in the Built Environment: A Laboratory Evaluation of Their Measurement Performance , 2022, Buildings.

[7]  M. Schweiker,et al.  Assessing comfort in the workplace: A unified theory of behavioral and thermal expectations , 2022, Building and Environment.

[8]  Z. Lian,et al.  Comparison of wrist skin temperature with mean skin temperature calculated with Hardy and Dubois's seven-point method while sleeping , 2022, Energy and Buildings.

[9]  I. Pigliautile,et al.  A New Wearable System for Sensing Outdoor Environmental Conditions for Monitoring Hyper-Microclimate , 2022, Sensors.

[10]  Fuyu Zhang,et al.  Towards a Living Lab for Enhanced Thermal Comfort and Air Quality: Analyses of Standard Occupancy, Weather Extremes, and COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[11]  Rongzhou Lin,et al.  A DIY approach to wearable sensor networks , 2021, Nature Electronics.

[12]  Clayton Miller,et al.  Personal thermal comfort models using digital twins: Preference prediction with BIM-extracted spatial-temporal proximity data from Build2Vec , 2021, Building and Environment.

[13]  Salvatore Carlucci,et al.  Test rooms to study human comfort in buildings: A review of controlled experiments and facilities , 2021 .

[14]  L. Maffei,et al.  Effects of urban noise variability on cognitive abilities in indoor spaces: Gender differences , 2021, Noise & Vibration Worldwide.

[15]  Massimiliano Masullo,et al.  Wearable Devices for Environmental Monitoring in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review , 2021, Sensors.

[16]  Jie Han,et al.  How human thermal plume influences near-human transport of respiratory droplets and airborne particles: a review , 2021, Environmental Chemistry Letters.

[17]  L. Norford,et al.  Project Coolbit: can your watch predict heat stress and thermal comfort sensation? , 2020 .

[18]  Francesco Salamone,et al.  A weighting procedure to analyse the Indoor Environmental Quality of a Zero-Energy Building , 2020 .

[19]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  pythermalcomfort: A Python package for thermal comfort research , 2020, SoftwareX.

[20]  I. Pigliautile,et al.  Data collected by coupling fix and wearable sensors for addressing urban microclimate variability in an historical Italian city , 2020, Data in brief.

[21]  L. Breton,et al.  Using wearable devices for assessing the impacts of hair exposome in Brazil , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Ming Jin,et al.  Personal thermal comfort models with wearable sensors , 2019, Building and Environment.

[23]  Gonçalo Marques,et al.  mHealth: Indoor Environmental Quality Measuring System for Enhanced Health and Well-Being Based on Internet of Things , 2019, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[24]  M. May.  A DIY approach to automating your lab , 2019, Nature.

[25]  B. Zaitchik,et al.  Estimating Occupational Heat Exposure From Personal Sampling of Public Works Employees in Birmingham, Alabama. , 2018, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[26]  Haldun Akoglu,et al.  User's guide to correlation coefficients , 2018, Turkish journal of emergency medicine.

[27]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Application of IoT and Machine Learning techniques for the assessment of thermal comfort perception. , 2018, Energy Procedia.

[28]  S Torresin,et al.  Combined effects of environmental factors on human perception and objective performance: A review of experimental laboratory works , 2018, Indoor air.

[29]  Italo Meroni,et al.  Integrated Method for Personal Thermal Comfort Assessment and Optimization through Users’ Feedback, IoT and Machine Learning: A Case Study , 2018, Sensors.

[30]  Anna Laura Pisello,et al.  A new wearable monitoring system for investigating pedestrians' environmental conditions: Development of the experimental tool and start-up findings. , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  William O'Brien,et al.  Review of current methods, opportunities, and challenges for in-situ monitoring to support occupant modelling in office spaces , 2017 .

[32]  Italo Meroni,et al.  A Low-Cost Environmental Monitoring System: How to Prevent Systematic Errors in the Design Phase through the Combined Use of Additive Manufacturing and Thermographic Techniques , 2016, Sensors.

[33]  Yong Zhu,et al.  Low-Power Wearable Systems for Continuous Monitoring of Environment and Health for Chronic Respiratory Disease , 2016, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[34]  Srdjan Krco,et al.  A comprehensive study of parameters in physical environment that impact students' focus during lecture using Internet of Things , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Felix Wortmann,et al.  Internet of Things , 2015, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[36]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions , 2012, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[37]  Z. Lian,et al.  Evaluation of calculation methods of mean skin temperature for use in thermal comfort study , 2011 .

[38]  A. Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[39]  Charlie Huizenga,et al.  Skin and core temperature response to partial- and whole-body heating and cooling , 2004 .

[40]  P. Fanger,et al.  Extension of the PMV model to non-air-conditioned buildings in warm climates , 2002 .

[41]  P. O. Fanger,et al.  Thermal environment — Human requirements , 1986 .

[42]  P A Hancock,et al.  Combined effects of heat and noise on human performance: a review. , 1985, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[43]  James D. Hardy,et al.  The technic of measuring radiation and convection , 1938 .

[44]  Dayi Lai,et al.  Thermal comfort models and their developments: A review , 2021 .

[45]  Jane Brennan,et al.  Spatial proximity is more than just a distance measure , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Matjaz Prek,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of human heat and mass transfer and their impact on thermal comfort , 2005 .

[47]  L. Berglund,et al.  A standard predictive index of human response to the thermal environment , 1986 .

[48]  P. Fanger.  Calculation of Thermal Comfort, Introduction of a Basic Comfort Equation , 1967 .