Theoretical Fashions in Crowdsourcing: A Snapshot of IS Research

When new information technologies emerge, they stimulate the curiosity of Information System (IS) research and practice. Research and practices regarding emerging technologies can be characterized as IS fashions, which can lead to IS innovations. Yet, researchers and practitioners often wonder if these fashions are the next big thing or just a passing fad. One way to determine the contribution of a scientific fashion is to understand its theoretical state and maturity as reported in the literature. We performed a theoretical assessment of one specific IS fashion: crowdsourcing. The main objective of our research is to understand the characteristics of theories in crowdsourcing research and to determine the origins of these theories. Using Gregor’s (2006) taxonomy, we performed a systematic literature review to identify and categorize the type of theories developed and used in crowdsourcing research. Close to forty percent of the surveyed articles are explanatory in nature, focusing on cause and effects relationships. Most articles use established theories to motivate research questions or hypotheses. Least common is theoretical research to motivate the design of crowdsourcing related artifacts.

[1]  I. C. Meijer.  The wisdom of crowds , 2010 .

[2]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Crowdsourcing: A Snapshot of Published Research , 2013, AMCIS.

[3]  Dahui Li,et al.  Task Design, Motivation, and Participation in Crowdsourcing Contests , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[4]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Crowdsourced Idea Generation: The Effect of Exposure to an Original Idea , 2013, AMCIS.

[5]  Henri Simula,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Crowdsourcing? , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Daren C. Brabham.  Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .

[7]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Christian Wagner,et al.  Structuring Time through Participation in Micro-task Crowdsourcing: A Time Allocation Perspective , 2014, ICIS.

[9]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Who's Contributing: Do Personality Traits Influence the Level and Type of Participation in Online Communities , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Conceptual Foundations of Crowdsourcing: A Review of IS Research , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Crowdsourcing Information Systems - A Systems Theory Perspective , 2011 .

[12]  Ping Wang,et al.  Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations , 2010, MIS Q..

[13]  Efraim Turban,et al.  What can crowdsourcing do for decision support? , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Yili Hong,et al.  An Empirical Investigation on Provider Pricing in Online Crowdsourcing Markets for IT Services , 2012, ICIS.

[15]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[16]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Rating Scales for Collective Intelligence in Innovation Communities: Why Quick and Easy Decision Making Does Not Get it Right , 2010, ICIS.

[17]  Lloyd Houser,et al.  A Conceptual Analysis of Information Science. , 1988 .

[18]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  - in-Progress , 2012 .

[19]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing - A Study on Mechanical Turk , 2011, AMCIS.

[20]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Motivations for Sustained Participation in Crowdsourcing: Case Studies of Citizen Science on the Role of Talk , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Evaluating Advanced Forms of Social Media Use in Government , 2013, AMCIS.

[22]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Lynne McKechnie,et al.  The use of theory in information science research , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  Yongqiang Sun,et al.  Investigating the Non-Linear Relationships in the Expectancy Theory: The Case of Crowdsourcing Marketplace , 2012, AMCIS.

[25]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Wiki Collaboration: Free-riding Students and Relational Social Capital , 2013, AMCIS.

[26]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Online Sourcing: Investigations from Service Clients' Perspective , 2011, AMCIS.

[27]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  The Crowd on the Assembly Line: Designing Tasks for a Better Crowdsourcing Experience , 2013, ICIS.

[28]  Lydia B. Chilton,et al.  The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing , 2010, EC '10.

[29]  Martin Schader,et al.  Workers' Task Choice in Crowdsourcing and Human Computation Markets , 2012, ICIS.

[30]  Mark Klein,et al.  Can We Exploit Collective Intelligence for Collaborative Deliberation? The Case of the Climate Change Collaboratorium , 2007 .

[31]  Shu Han,et al.  Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge Capabilities , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Mark Keil,et al.  Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Optimal Design of Crowdsourcing Contests , 2009, ICIS.

[34]  Michel Avital,et al.  Generative Collectives , 2010, ICIS.

[35]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: theoretically speaking , 2003 .

[36]  A. Kahl,et al.  Crowdsourcing as a tool in conflict prevention , 2012 .

[37]  Daren C. Brabham.  Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application to Improve Public Engagement in Transit Planning , 2012 .

[38]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Evolution of Social Commerce: The People, Management, Technology, and Information Dimensions , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Human computation: a survey and taxonomy of a growing field , 2011, CHI.

[40]  Krittinee Nuttavuthisit.  If you can’t beat them, let them join: The development of strategies to foster consumers’ co-creative practices , 2010 .

[41]  Tore Dybå,et al.  A Systematic Review of Theory Use in Software Engineering Experiments , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[42]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[43]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice , 2009, MIS Q..

[44]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Hanjun Lee,et al.  What Determines an Agreeable and Adoptable Idea? A Study of User Ideas on MyStarbucksIdea.com , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[46]  Pairin Katerattanakul,et al.  Is information systems a reference discipline? , 2006, CACM.

[47]  Yoris A. Au,et al.  Assessing Researcher Publication Productivity in the Leading Information Systems Journals: A 2005-2009 Update , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  F. Galton.  Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.

[49]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[50]  Beibei Li,et al.  Designing Ranking Systems for Hotels on Travel Search Engines by Mining User-Generated and Crowd-Sourced Content , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[51]  Tat Koon Koh.  Participants' Strategy in Crowd-Based Design Contests - A Prospect Theory Perspective , 2014, ICIS.