Disentangling organizational commitment

Much of commitment research is based on the belief that the concept consists of three different aspects: identification, desire to stay and extra effort. Shows that the three‐dimensional concept is misleading. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests that the organizational commitment questionnaire (OCQ) is not homogenous, but consists of three separate concepts. This is confirmed by correlational analysis with theoretically relevant variables which reveals that identification, desire to stay and extra effort are associated with different antecedents. The poor research output to date on organizational commitment can be explained by reference to the small weight given to discretionary effort in the OCQ, the most widely used commitment scale. Discusses implications for research and management policies.

[1]  Frederick A. Russ,et al.  Links among satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intentions: The moderating effect of experience, gender, and performance , 1995 .

[2]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore , 1995 .

[3]  D. J. Dwyer,et al.  The Effects of Understaffing on Individual and Group Performance in Professional and Trade Occupations , 1995 .

[4]  Richard W. Woodman,et al.  Understanding organizational change: A schematic perspective , 1995 .

[5]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  Assessing Organizational Commitment: An Employee's Global Attitude toward the Organization , 1995 .

[6]  W. L. Cron,et al.  Economic dependency on work: A moderator of the relationship between organizational commitment and performance. , 1995 .

[7]  Catherine Kirchmeyer Demographic similarity to the work group: A longitudinal study of managers at the early career stage , 1995 .

[8]  R. Peccei,et al.  The Dimensionality and Stability of Organizational Commitment: A Longitudinal Examination of Cook and Walls (1980) Organizational Commitment Scale (BOCS) , 1993 .

[9]  Charles W. Mueller,et al.  Economic, psychological, and sociological determinants of voluntary turnover , 1990 .

[10]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Commitment Scales , 1990 .

[11]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[12]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment , 1990 .

[13]  James C. McElroy,et al.  On assessing measures of work commitment , 1986 .

[14]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[15]  P. Morrow Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment , 1983 .

[16]  N. Aranya,et al.  A Comparison of Two Organizational Commitment Scales. , 1983 .

[17]  J. Perry,et al.  An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. , 1981 .

[18]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[19]  R. Lissitz,et al.  Limitations of Coefficient Alpha as an Index of Test Unidimensionality1 , 1977 .

[20]  Yoash Wiener,et al.  Commitment: A behavioral approach to job involvement☆ , 1977 .

[21]  Bruce Buchanan BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: THE SOCIALIZATION OF MANAGERS IN WORK ORGANIZATIONS , 1974 .

[22]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[23]  M. E. Sheldon,et al.  Investments and Involvements as Mechanisms Producing Commitment to the Organization , 1971 .