What makes a good VET teacher? Views of Australian VET teachers and students

Abstract The quality of teaching in the vocational education and training (VET) sector in Australia has been an area of concern for much of the twenty-first century (e.g. Department of Education and Training, 2016). While much debate has taken place about ways forward, there has been little substantive progress in reforming the education and professional development of VET teachers to address quality concerns. However, in the absence of a clear consensus and articulation of what constitutes ‘good VET teaching’ and what is required to produce it, it is doubtful that any endeavour to improve the quality of VET teaching would be successful. This paper contributes to the evidence base that could inform improvements in VET teaching by examining the views of two key interest groups – VET teachers and learners, on ‘what makes a good VET teacher’, and analyses the common themes as well as particularities in their views and their possible explanations. The findings are then examined as dimensions of interconnected practices that constitute VET teaching.

[1]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , 1996 .

[2]  Tj Lynch,et al.  Summary report of key findings for the Australian Government: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) - How are primary education health and physical education (HPE) teachers best prepared? , 2013 .

[3]  Paul Hager,et al.  Practice, Learning and Change , 2012 .

[4]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[5]  Keiko Yasukawa,et al.  Teaching Practice in the Making: Shaping and Reshaping the Field of Adult Language, Literacy and Numeracy Teaching. , 2012 .

[6]  B. Clayton.  Practitioner Experiences and Expectations with the Certificate IV in Training and Assessment (TAA40104): A Discussion of the Issues , 2009 .

[7]  J. Reid.  A practice turn for teacher education? , 2011 .

[8]  Erica Smith,et al.  VET teacher education in Australian universities , 2015 .

[9]  C. Tanner,et al.  Teaching is a practice. , 1997, The Journal of nursing education.

[10]  Erica Smith,et al.  From training reform to training packages , 2003 .

[11]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[12]  M. Tyler.  Continuing professional development for a diverse VET practitioner workforce , 2017 .

[13]  Studies in the Theory and Practice of Professionalism: Ways Forward , 2009 .

[14]  Erica Smith,et al.  The Certificate IV in Assessment and Workplace Training: Understanding Learners and Learning , 2006 .

[15]  Erica Smith,et al.  VET teacher education in Australian universities: who are the students and what are their views about their courses? , 2015 .

[16]  S. Kemmis,et al.  Ecologies of Practices , 2012 .

[17]  Stephen Kemmis,et al.  Knowing practice: searching for saliences , 2005 .

[18]  M. O’Leary.  Expansive and restrictive approaches to professionalism in FE colleges: the observation of teaching and learning as a case in point , 2013, Professionalism in Post-Compulsory Education and Training.

[19]  E. Wheelahan,et al.  The quality of teaching in VET: overview , 2010 .

[20]  Jack J. Phillips,et al.  The Case for a New System , 2018 .

[21]  Susanne Köpsén.  How vocational teachers describe their vocational teacher identity , 2014 .

[22]  P. Liamputtong.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[23]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[24]  D. Wallin.  Vocational Education and Training Workforce , 2010 .

[25]  Jonathan Tummons.  ‘Very positive’ or ‘vague and detached’? Unpacking ambiguities in further education teachers’ responses to professional standards in England , 2016 .

[26]  L. Shulman.  Signature pedagogies in the professions , 2005, Daedalus.

[27]  A. Tsui,et al.  Distinctive qualities of expert teachers , 2009 .