Public service motivation and job performance of public sector employees in the Netherlands

This article contributes in three ways to our understanding of public service motivation (PSM) and its effects. In the first place, it applies an abridged version of Perry's measurement scale in the Dutch public sector. Although the results of the analysis show that PSM is a valid concept in this context, doubts arise as to whether one should use the same four dimensions as in the USA. Second, the analysis shows that — contrary to expectations — PSM is of equal importance in the segments of the Dutch public sector that were investigated. Third, the effect of PSM on three performance-related behavioural outcome variables (commitment, willingness to exert effort and perceived job performance) is analysed. In addition to PSM, a measurement of PSM fit is included. The hypothesis that PSM fit mediates the relationship between PSM and the outcome variables is rejected. In practice, it appears that both PSM and PSM fit have independent effects on these outcome variables. Points for practitioners Public organizations have to attract people who are motivated to work for the sector. In the Netherlands, the Ministry of the Interior is running a recruitment campaign to achieve this. This article shows the value of this strategy as workers with such a motivation (`public service motivation' or PSM) are more committed to the organization, more willing to exert effort and have a higher perception of their performance. Probably this will reflect in better public service delivery. However, the article also shows that recruiting PSM-oriented workers is not enough. It is also important that workers will be able to really `use' their PSM in their work. If not, they will become frustrated, which in the end will have adverse effects for the quality of public service delivery.

[1]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Gender Dimensions of Public Service Motivation , 2006 .

[2]  Ike-Elechi Ogba,et al.  Commitment in the workplace: The impact of income and age on employee commitment in Nigerian banking sector , 2008 .

[3]  Bram Steijn,et al.  Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation , 2008 .

[4]  Sue Hutchinson,et al.  Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence , 2007 .

[5]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  An Examination Of Competing Versions Of The Person-Environment Fit Approach To Stress , 1996 .

[6]  J. Gould-Williams The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations , 2003 .

[7]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[8]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes , 2003 .

[9]  James L. Perry,et al.  Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity , 1996 .

[10]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[11]  Leonard Bright,et al.  Does Person-Organization Fit Mediate the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and the Job Performance of Public Employees? , 2007 .

[12]  Annie Hondeghem,et al.  Motivation in public management : the call of public service , 2007 .

[13]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Sangmook Kim,et al.  Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations , 2004 .

[15]  D. D. Gilder,et al.  Het 3-componentenmodel van commitment , 1997 .

[16]  D. Guest Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[17]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees , 2006 .

[18]  W. Vandenabeele,et al.  Development of a Public Service Motivation Measurement Scale: Corroborating and Extending Perry's Measurement Instrument , 2008 .

[19]  David J. Woehr,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSON–ORGANIZATION FIT AND BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES , 2006 .

[20]  J. Perry Bringing Society In: Toward a Theory of Public-Service Motivation , 2000 .

[21]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[22]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[23]  Emanuel Camilleri,et al.  Towards Developing an Organisational Commitment - Public Service Motivation Model for the Maltese Public Service Employees , 2006 .

[24]  Tomoki Sekiguchi A contingency perspective of the importance of PJ fit and PO fit in employee selection , 2007 .